Latest videos by truthforrealtruth | Electronic Cigarette Videos

======================================
Try Ecigarette For FREE At http://tryecigarette.com
======================================

I am a creationist, again!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 59 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

World War II Planes and Ice Layers!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 160 seconds

Another one bites the dust!
The Talk Origins Page.'.s.'.;:
http://toarchive. org/indexcc/CD/CD410 .html

Related: truthforrealtruth, audio, video, etceteras, exceteras

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

I am back, and with a short rant on creationism!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 316 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

i meant that a ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 01 Sep 10, 00:32:15
i meant that a theory is? not just any old idea. a theory is a collection of observed facts that explains a fact. it is the strongest position in science. again, it is a fact that the earth revolves around the sun. it is a fact that the earth is the third planet from the sun, the speed of the planet the tilt of the planet...many many things in science are known for a fact.

aha so wut exactly ...
By: ABoy877. on 30 Aug 10, 21:24:01
aha so wut exactly do u mean by "if I told u gravity? is false.."?? Is gravity trying to prove something? Never said its a viable theory, my point was that there is no such thing as fact in science, and how do you know that the effect of such a system is not accounted for in the math? did u do scientific research? are u a geologist? physicist?

actually no. the ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 27 Aug 10, 01:41:49
actually no. the people who believe our system is binary have no evidence for this and lack and education in this field. the? effects of a binary star system on the gravity of all these planets would be accounted for in our maths. we would recognize this. just because people have an idea doesnt mean its a viable theory. if i told you gravity is false and its just gods love holding us to the earth would you say it is closed minded to say im silly? i hope you would!

thats not my point ...
By: ABoy877. on 26 Aug 10, 23:32:15
thats not my point homey! for example, it is a well established theory and commonly accepted "fact" that our earth revolves around one sun in a singular solar system, HOWEVER the vast majority of solar systems in the universe are binary or even tertiary solar systems with multiple suns. sum people believe our? sun has a dead twin that is hard to detect but getting closer to us gradually, now if u tell sum indoctrinated scientist he will say ur crazy but that is not scientific thinkin

i would have to ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 27 Dec 09, 19:24:35
i would have to disagree and say that is a common politically correct appeal to the laymen. in reality we know it is a fact that the earth revolves around the sun. we know that our precipitation cycle is fueled by the sun evaporating water. there are many facts that science has? shown the word theory itself is just an explanation of the fact. it a FACT cells decay the theory explains how and to say it MAY be wrong is just a safe guard. its a fact that the computer works because of its components

lol right so ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 27 Dec 09, 19:21:05
lol right so scientists have a hidden agenda to fool the public into thinking one thing is? true and not the other? what purpose would they have for lying? the first person to show that evolution was false would win millionsin grant money to study whats actually going on. scientists have in hidden agenda other than interpreting the tested observations and explaining them. it seems if anyone is fooled its the person believing ancient myths over testable observable fact.

Haha, and I don't ...
By: phicomingatya. on 26 Dec 09, 21:42:38
Haha, and I don't care what you think. Just like your theory, you jump to conclusions based on hardly any relevant? facts and sound reason. Evolution is easy to understand. But in your narrow view, all who do not support it, somehow do not understand any of it.

.]"...Major ...
By: ABoy877. on 26 Dec 09, 20:08:00
.]"...Major problems you say it's beneficial so it is selected. No story of how, just magically mutated and selected...." HAHAHAHA yea? i think YOU dont understand evolution at all!

i aint trying to ...
By: ABoy877. on 26 Dec 09, 20:05:57
i aint trying to knock ur reasoning and obviously this kid has no clue about the truth of his own believes and history but i have to say if u are a tru scientist then you NEVER accept anything as fact! thats the whole point of science, it evolves, perceptions of reality evolve jus like everything else, therefore theories are NOT? fact and what we think we understand about nature and its laws today may change drastically tomorrow

I don't know what ...
By: phicomingatya. on 25 Jul 09, 12:28:08
I don't know what kind of pseudo-science you are conducting, but? believe what you want to. Any scientist can find genes in different species and build a story around it. They obviously can fool you, but not me.

The mammary gland ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 24 Jul 09, 19:44:50
The mammary gland derives from an ancestral apocrine-like gland that was associated with hair follicles. This association? is retained by monotreme mammary glands and is evident as vestigial mammary hair during early ontogenetic development of marsupials.

Lactation is an ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 24 Jul 09, 19:43:13
Lactation is an ancient reproductive trait that predates the origin of mammals. The synapsid branch of the amniote tree that separated from other taxa in the Pennsylvanian (>310 million years ago)? evolved a glandular rather than scaled integument. Repeated radiations of synapsids produced a gradual accrual of mammalian features.

First, what you ...
By: phicomingatya. on 24 Jul 09, 13:29:29
First, what you claim to know about the evolution off mammary glands, is full of made up stories. Glands are? not preserved in fossils, nor does any extant species show a new stage of development in skin patches. Second, your whole story doesn't even quite answer the question now, does it? What was the question again? Read back please. And you are suppose to explain to me? Haha, you are good at avoiding the question and answer a question never aske with a fabricated story.

you dont understand ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 23 Jul 09, 15:25:09
you dont understand. the mutation of the mammary gland was due to other reasons not to produce milk for the young. it? has much to do with the immune system. One scenario begins with the development of a vascularized patch of skin intended to facilitate the incubation of eggs of warm-blooded pre-mammlian reptiles. Since hair insulates the body, a patch of bare skin in contact with the egg could have been of benefit as far as warming eggs would have gone.

okay so im blinded. ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 23 Jul 09, 15:21:25
okay so im blinded...by what i dont know. im the one who looks at thing OBJECTIVELY. you are blinded by your particular religion....now that we have the insults out of the way. mutation happens because during reproduction the genetic information is never 100% correct due to nature being imperfect and also radiation from our sun causing mutations....the environment? and the sexual mates will select for whatever is beneficial...and when they select what isnt nature kills it. SIMPLE.

One question! If ...
By: phicomingatya. on 23 Jul 09, 04:58:28
One question! If you can answer me with facts, then I'll no longer debate against you. When mammal babies need milk, how do they even survive to reach adulthood and reproduce, when it mustt have taken the firs mammals many generations of subsequent mutations to? form the necessary mammary glands. It's not like wanna be mammal reptiles evolved mammary glands first without tem being necessary, and then all mammal descendants became weaker and in need of te milk at birth. You are full of error.

You don't ...
By: phicomingatya. on 23 Jul 09, 04:51:39
You don't understand that you are a blinded, trying to help out the seeing. Your assumption that I do not understand evolution, is already such error. You evolunists always make it sound like evolution is such a hard mechanism to understand. Face it: it's not! Mutation and survival (through selection as you? like to call it), that's all there is to it. Major problems you say it's beneficial so it is selected. No story of how, just magically mutated and selected.

okay well i am ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 22 Jul 09, 23:55:12
okay well i am presently in university majoring in evolutionary psychology so i have a firm grasp of evolution and am well aware of all the evidence for it. evolution is a fact that is something people need to understand. just like gravity is and germs are. all theories all? facts aswell. so once again what about evolution do you not understand because i would love to help you out. or are you looking at it from a religiou bias perspective and nothing can convince you otherwise?

Why? are you asking ...
By: phicomingatya. on 22 Jul 09, 07:36:05
Why? are you asking? What abou evolution, does make sense? I know it may make sense to you, but once you know all that I know and understood what I understood, nothing of evolution makes sense.

so did you become a ...
By: skitzoLSD. on 21 Jul 09, 21:28:07
so did you become a theistic creationist? if so why, what changed your mind?? and what about evolution didnt make sense to you?

Nice, theistic ...
By: JohananRaatz. on 17 Jul 09, 04:47:24
Nice, theistic evolutionism makes the most sense to me. I used to be a creationist as a kid, and people like Kent Hovind were sincere, but to be honest they? didn't really know what they were talking about.

2 Peter 3 In the ...
By: blackshadowsnoopy. on 08 May 09, 05:41:58
2 Peter 3 In the last? days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say, "Where is this 'coming' he promised? Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation." But they deliberately forget that long ago by God's word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water. By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed.

Well, this is ...
By: phicomingatya. on 28 Dec 08, 19:51:50
Well, this is interesting :) A theistic creationist becoming an evolutionist. For me, it's the other way around, lol. But good luck on? the other side :p

Lolz.? thanks.
By: truthforrealtruth. on 27 Dec 08, 23:15:16
Lolz.? thanks.

good video. please ...
By: dirkamus. on 26 Dec 08, 07:57:37
good video. please make an Announcement before? you go on stickam? Thanks.

On Militant Atheism
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 245 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Have you ever ...
By: kuroshashu. on 14 Oct 08, 19:21:54
Have you ever actually listened to any of the cited atheists speak? They're all very calm, articulate and polite. I'm not saying that all atheists are like that, but I think you find that, just as intelligence and income correlate? with atheism, so does social grace and generosity.

I knew a guy from ...
By: ukchristian28. on 14 Oct 08, 18:49:24
I knew a guy from Iran. He converted from Islam? to Christianity and paid a very high price. His house was firebombed in the middle of the night, and he almost died. He had to flee his country for his own safety and my church helped him gain British citizenship. Your implication that people are just products of their environment wouldn't go down too well with him.

They still have a ...
By: jakrum. on 14 Oct 08, 18:46:59
They still have a way to go yet. But if they open there minds maybe, just maybe they will see the truth. When it happens they will? know.

The geography of ...
By: ukchristian28. on 14 Oct 08, 18:44:00
The geography of faith argument only proves that it is more likely that you will embrace a particular religion or philosphy if it is the most common belief where you grow up. It doesn't however prove anything concerning whether or not a particular religion or belief is true or false. I mean, you seem to be implying that no one chooses to be a? Christian, which isn't right. Continued:

And what about ...
By: ukchristian28. on 14 Oct 08, 18:37:13
And what about people who have worked just as hard to educate themselves but have come? to believe in God?

Its a shame to see ...
By: jakrum. on 14 Oct 08, 17:37:56
Its a shame to see a young life destined to walk this wonderfull world with his head firmly inserted up his own arse. Good luck to you? kid, your guna need it.

How about the ...
By: CognosSquare. on 14 Oct 08, 15:34:03
How about the people Pat Robertson wants? killed?

There is no " ...
By: CognosSquare. on 14 Oct 08, 15:24:04
There is no "evidence" for Jesus resurrection. The gospels were written 40 years after Jesus? allegedly died. No other historian mentions Jesus being resurrected and flying up to the sky. You set the standard of "evidence" so ridiculously low that anything goes to show that you just want to believe.

Killing a belief is ...
By: Cafeeine. on 14 Oct 08, 15:21:16
Killing a belief is not a bad thing in itself. We all do it every day, when we correct somebody of a mistake they made. I don't see why religious belief should be exempt, and I don't see how you can justify it? to me from an atheist's perspective. Do you not strive to correct things you consider wrong?

Not my point. You ...
By: Cafeeine. on 14 Oct 08, 15:18:14
Not my point. You have a? different, lower standard for theistic militancy that you do for the atheist kind.

Why dont you belief ...
By: CognosSquare. on 14 Oct 08, 10:01:27
Why dont you belief in djinns? Are you AFRAID of them? Is that why you also dont believe in unicorns and santa clause. They are scary. And you dont have any reason to believe that either unicorns or angels exists. If you could prove angels you would actually get the nobel price. But you cant. You just WANT to believe in something. God hates gays. Its in the bible you know. Shellfish and homosexuals are "abominations to? god". Abomination is something you hate according to merriam-webster.

No I'm not clueless ...
By: maglavagna. on 14 Oct 08, 09:59:05
No I'm not clueless. Are you? What evidence is there for Jesus's ressurection? What do you mean "Name one evidence? for atheism?". Atheism is a none beleif in god due to the fact that there is no evidence for gods existence. That is how atheism is based on evidence. The beleif in god on the other hand is based on no evidence whatsoever.

i am a milatant ...
By: greycloud24. on 14 Oct 08, 08:36:25
i am a milatant atheist. my intent when attacking religion is not to de-convert you rather it is to set a societal standard of removing the respect that religion gets but does not deserve. why? should i respect islam any more than i respect greek mythology? why should i respect christianity any more than i respect politics or islam for that matter? i seek to remove the status of religon, not to deconvert the followers of religion. stupid people will remain stupid.

Soooo...speaking ...
By: a012345. on 14 Oct 08, 08:06:53
Soooo...speaking out in a public matter is militant? Why does atheist have to be polite when they're speaking what is? Do we tell you to go to hell? Most atheist don't even talk about it until it's rubbed in their face. Darwins, Hitchens and? Dennett is merely trying to bring the topic that is taboo into the open. I hardly see that as being militant. This video is not very well thought out. Theists need to stop acting like a victim when they been prosecuting people for centuries for non belief.

Muslims/Terrorists.?
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Oct 08, 05:44:03
Muslims/Terrorists.?

Lolz, thanks. I ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Oct 08, 05:43:50
Lolz, thanks. I very rarely rate a video with one? star.

I wasen't? focusing ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Oct 08, 05:43:05
I wasen't? focusing on Muslims.

Did you notice ...
By: Cafeeine. on 14 Oct 08, 04:46:33
Did you notice that you call atheists militants when they talk about things, while theist militants are those who kill people. Double-standardish isn't it??

The Atheist Bible ( ...
By: FranzDuckVideos. on 14 Oct 08, 04:20:52
The Atheist Bible (Harry Potter 5) says to convert people to atheism... xD JKJK Guys, STOP RATING THIS VIDEO LOW RATINGS! ALSIUDGNAFLIUGADHBALKYVAHBVUALIHN He's just expressing his opinion!? I'll give you 5 stars to fix your rating.

What exactly ...
By: Rheinhard. on 14 Oct 08, 03:58:10
What exactly constitues a "militant" vs. "non-militant" atheist? As far as I can tell, it's an atheist who speaks in any way publicly about atheism. The only "OK" atheist is one who never talks about it, and who probably goes to church once in a while so as not to make people suspicious. Meanwhile everything in our society is organized around making you feel that if you don't believe in God there's something deeply wrong with you.? You don't see any politicians pandering for the atheist vote.

Okay.?
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Oct 08, 02:38:48
Okay.?

No problemos dude,? ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Oct 08, 02:38:39
No problemos dude,? self defense, nearly.

They describe ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Oct 08, 02:38:00
They describe themselves as militant atheists.?

i am often called a ...
By: jassi4010709. on 14 Oct 08, 02:31:12
i am often called a militant atheist.... simply because i have a no nonsense policy on bullshit ,that religious fundementalists like to claim.... if? people want to believe in religion....thats not a problem, as with practically all militant atheists.... but as soon as it becomes an advertiseing campaign of bollocks or starts to affect others rights and freedoms....i attack with an iron fist of logic.

Religion can have a ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Oct 08, 00:54:44
Religion can have a negative impact on the world, but it largely doesn't. When you meet a Christian in a small town in America, they'll generally go to church on Sunday's, and pray at night, not too much, not too little. Some take it too far.... but don't generalize us with? them.

The Debate Ends!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 203 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Romans 1:20, again. ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 29 Sep 08, 04:11:49
Romans 1:20, again. What you're? doing is like me saying, 'Well, we think that we have evidence for (insert scientific theory here) somewhere! But, we aren't quite sure directly where, so that means that it's true! NO!

Your? complete ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 29 Sep 08, 03:02:17
Your? complete answer: I don't know! Only GOD knows! I am done speaking with you.

Romans 1:20 - We ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 21:02:05
Romans 1:20 - We know? God by what he has created. Why only apes and humans then? Why the same place? Why not all of the other animals as well? Is he deceiving us just to test our faith?

BECAUSE IT ISN'T A ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 18:51:05
BECAUSE IT ISN'T A YES OR NO ANSWER FOR ME! MY GOD, YOU JUST WANT EVERYONE TO BOW DOWN TO YOUR? WILL, YOU SOUND LIKE A FREAKING DICTATOR! Based upon what we now know, there is not one shred of evidence that points towards God having created apes and humans with the same ERV in the exact same place. This would preach closer to No.

Okay, answer my ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 08:05:11
Okay, answer my original questions: Why only apes and humans then?? Why the same place? Why not all of the other animals as well? Is he deceiving us just to test our faith?

Based upon what we ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 03:03:55
Based upon what we now know, there is not one shred of evidence that points towards God having created apes and humans with the same ERV in the exact? same place. Also, please answer my original questions for more info. Romands 1:20 I think it is, says that we know God for what he has created, so there!

I? just answered it ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 03:02:17
I? just answered it, wow.

I'm sorry, did I ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 01:18:41
I'm sorry, did I say 'NOT', I? meant: CAN'T! IGNORANCE!

Okay, I don't mind ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 01:17:12
Okay, I don't mind if you want to just? NOT answer my question. It wouldn't be in God's interest to do so. What is it's purpose? To give us cancer? Okay. Fair enough.... NOT!

For the millionth ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 01:09:28
For the millionth time, it depends upon YOUR answers.?

You admit that I ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 01:05:38
You admit that I cannot answer until you answer my questions. I will give you an answer eventually. But YOU deny your answers, because you CAN'T answer them, can? you?

Well, my answer ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 28 Sep 08, 00:17:15
Well, my answer depends on your answers.?

No need to get ...
By: goboy100. on 28 Sep 08, 00:13:59
No need to get yourself all stressed out about a debate. Life is too short and it's just not worth geting yourself all worked? up. We live in a society where it seems we never have enough time to do the things we would like to do and to bring personal matters to a conclussion can sometimes be overwhelming because of our busy schedules. You're doing the right thing . You're not quiting the debate just simply taking a break away from it. Continue on with your education and you'll be just fine.:D

Why only apes and ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 27 Sep 08, 21:05:11
Why only apes and humans then? Why the same place? Why not? all of the other animals as well? Is he deceiving us just to test our faith?

No. That's using ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 27 Sep 08, 17:01:37
No. That's using the God of the Gaps argument. Saying that, 'Well.... We can't explain it! So that means? that it was created by GOD!' NO.

Go ahead.? It's ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 26 Sep 08, 22:13:01
Go ahead.? It's still an irrefutable argument for evolution.

Lolz, that's? good.
By: truthforrealtruth. on 26 Sep 08, 21:06:01
Lolz, that's? good.

Who??
By: truthforrealtruth. on 26 Sep 08, 19:52:00
Who??

You know kinda ...
By: goboy100. on 26 Sep 08, 04:31:44
You know kinda think of it I think I have ocd? too lol

I love ur humor? ...
By: goboy100. on 25 Sep 08, 10:49:27
I love ur humor? and ur cute! :P

Yes, many times he? ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 24 Sep 08, 21:44:20
Yes, many times he? does.

Scotsbhoy? uses ...
By: FranzDuckVideos. on 24 Sep 08, 20:03:57
Scotsbhoy? uses strawman arguments

I haven't been ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 24 Sep 08, 19:17:55
I haven't been diagnosed with it, but I? am pretty damn sure that I have it. LOLZ! NO! HAHA.

ok wat? Debates do ...
By: bigbear198808. on 24 Sep 08, 11:08:36
ok wat? Debates do u do

Atheist Morality, 2
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 153 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

This "ultimate ...
By: ScientiaVeritasEtLux. on 08 Nov 08, 20:13:32
This "ultimate authority" figure that you are talking about doesn't have to be a supreme being who hands out your morality when you exit the womb. There can be an "ultimate" morality based simply on the 'golden rule', based on the? human ability to empathize. Empathy has an evolutionary explanation by the way, but I won't go into that unless you want me to. But everybody gets their (logical) morals from their ability to empathize. As truthforrealtruth said, the "extra" morals come from the bible.

You dont hear that ...
By: kais3rz3r0. on 04 Oct 08, 20:26:14
You dont hear that from many christians? :o

You dishonest ...
By: a012345. on 20 Sep 08, 15:07:41
You dishonest douche. If you seriously believe what you just? posted, you yourself have no morals, religious or not. Go read Deuteronomy 20:13-14. Do those women and children seem like they were volunteers? I didn't know people volunteered to be conquered and sold into slavery. Serfdom and indentured servitude came much later on. Also, I'll pay 50 silver for your daughter/wife/sister. I'll treat her much better than you ever will. You better read your damn fairy tale book again more carefully.

So slavery? and ...
By: a012345. on 20 Sep 08, 14:13:59
So slavery? and beating them is quite alright? I guess it's okay since they had slaves to build temples for him. Treating women as shit doesn't sit too well with me either. They are definitely worth more than 50 pieces of silver IMO. What happened to the golden rule that came later? Isn't that a change of morality?

God changes his ...
By: a012345. on 19 Sep 08, 23:50:58
God changes his mind all the time. It's not morality if you simply just follow someone's word. There is no just right and wrong since the world it's not so black and white. It's really situation and based on perspective. Once again, you would need a moral basis to begin with to even judge if what? you're choosing to believe in is good or bad. You seem to not grasp this or ignore it somehow.

More Energy Drink.. ...
By: ChristianLipps. on 19 Sep 08, 21:17:56
More Energy Drink...?

when it comes to ...
By: jassi4010709. on 19 Sep 08, 18:21:59
when it comes to morals, religious followers really dont grasp the origins of the "good morals" they choose to follow.... there is no "good moral" that was created by any secular religion as they all existed long before the holy books. holy books also happen to contain a mass amount of "bad morals" and brought many immoral actions INTO society, discrimination being the lead example. its quite rare to meet? a person with more general morals than an atheist..and they are rarely ever monotheists.

What are the "extra ...
By: a012345. on 19 Sep 08, 16:48:18
What are the "extra" morals that you get from the bible you don't get from secular? means?

Christians can't ...
By: a012345. on 19 Sep 08, 16:47:20
Christians can't account for their morality on a universal basis either. No Christians interprets their beliefs? or morals laws exactly the same way either. Just a Catholic and Protestant would have major disagreement. Religion does not have a monopoly on morals. In fact, religion has no part in morals. You would need a moral basis to begin with to even judge if what you're choosing to believe in is good or bad.

Great examples.?
By: truthforrealtruth. on 19 Sep 08, 05:21:31
Great examples.?

It's actually ...
By: baraqiyal. on 19 Sep 08, 04:24:02
It's actually pretty simple. If you would like someone to do to you what you're contemplating doing to someone else, e.g. returning a lost wallet: moral. If you wouldn't like someone to this thing to you, e.g., punching someone in the face: immoral. Christians call it the Golden Rule? but obviously it's been the basis for morality since long before Christianity.

Correct. Their ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 19 Sep 08, 03:08:43
Correct. Their moral standards DO vary from person? to person, so I would be compelled to agree.... amazing, isn't it? Lolz, jk.

Define? 'Universal ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 19 Sep 08, 02:33:07
Define? 'Universal Basis."

The morality we get ...
By: FranzDuckVideos. on 19 Sep 08, 00:07:49
The morality we get is from? evolution. However I understand how you say "We have extra morals from the Bible," which I agree with. But those morals are subjective.

Atheist Morality, 1
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 228 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Why would I have to ...
By: a012345. on 18 Sep 08, 17:47:19
Why would I have to be on the burden of explanation when you make inaccurate unthoughtful statements like "Atheists can't account for absolute/universal morality.". You're pretty much? claiming without a religious text or believing in any deity, that person would have moral which is just stupid.

If you? seriously ...
By: a012345. on 18 Sep 08, 17:40:09
If you? seriously think they shot up the school because they were atheist, you are just being disingenuous and dishonest willfully.

Or the unibomber ...
By: a012345. on 18 Sep 08, 17:39:10
Or the unibomber and those douchebags who flew? planes into the twin towers.

Common experience ...
By: a012345. on 18 Sep 08, 17:37:59
Common experience and common consensus. It's pretty simple to see the outcome if everyone goes out? and kills everyone, rapes and pillages.

Religion has also ...
By: a012345. on 18 Sep 08, 16:52:43
Religion has also given religious people a cope out. Instead of fixing the wrong, they can pray to an imaginary being for forgiveness while the victim is still screwed. Personal empowerment for positive change does? not require religion. People will change if they want to change.

Actually the bible ...
By: a012345. on 18 Sep 08, 16:50:53
Actually the bible say murder, rape, pillaging and slavery is good.? It's even got guidelines for it. If anything, the lack of your absolute morality from the bible is good. People don't get morality from a magic book. If you insist that I have to base it on some sort of stone slab or something, I'll go with code of Hammurabi. People that commits crimes gets punished according in rational society such as our's. No laws are perfect. Secular laws pwns your biblical laws any day of the week.

that you get your ...
By: DehumanizeTV. on 18 Sep 08, 16:50:33
that you get your morals from your commen sense and your? surroundings as well, and not from some ancient text. just open your eyes and see the bigger picture

for them it is ok, ...
By: DehumanizeTV. on 18 Sep 08, 16:49:23
for them it is ok, because that is all they know and for them there are not cruel intentions to it, in africa? living in their huts in their community away from the modern world is all they know, same for the south american tribes who live in the rain forrest. so what works for them wont work for us and vise versa but they do know that it is wrong to just randomly kill babies im sure, and they dont have a holy book telling them so. this is how an atheist has morals without a bible, and im sure

that almost eveyone ...
By: DehumanizeTV. on 18 Sep 08, 16:46:24
that almost eveyone agrees with? this. now how is this so? not because the bible says it but because its understood that a child is not mature, they have not finished growing their mind has not fully devolped yet so they are not ready for it, that is the common sense part, here is where we get it from the world we live in. you and i have grown up and taught that it was not ok so that is how it is, something passed down, but in south america and africa they do marry off children to adults and

yes i think you ...
By: DehumanizeTV. on 18 Sep 08, 16:42:01
yes i think you need to rethink this. just because i dont believe in god and your christ or the bible means i dont have morals? that means that your saying that if you didnt have a bible dictating you and telling you what is right and wrong then you wouldnt know that its not ok to go out and kill babies... i have morals and i get them from commen sense and the world around me? here is a prime example. here in america it is wrong for an adult to be with a child, i agree with this and im sure

And I? hope you ...
By: baraqiyal. on 18 Sep 08, 16:32:28
And I? hope you don't turn out like the Christian who recently shot up a Unitarian church for being too liberal.

Everyone gets their ...
By: baraqiyal. on 18 Sep 08, 16:27:39
Everyone gets their morals from pretty much the same places: their own sense of empathy, teachings from their parents, expectations from society, etc. Religious people just through the extra step of picking and choosing passages from their holy book to justify their morality. All the research that has been done on the topic shows that, on average, even the most hard core atheist is just as moral? as the most fundamentalist Christian.

I am an atheist and ...
By: Terrencje. on 18 Sep 08, 16:20:06
I am an atheist and I believe that no one has the right to do things he like, but do not harm other people (exept when self-defending off course). Treat another person like you want to be treated yourself (sounds like what a famous? person once sayed)

I agree, atheists ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Sep 08, 11:06:55
I agree, atheists can be moral. My purpose for this video is just to express my thoughts. It's just? odd the way this unfolded.

u kno im an atheist ...
By: Coremeister13. on 18 Sep 08, 01:05:29
u kno im an atheist, but im not even violent, an di have my set of morals, which? are a lot liek the bible becasue i if murder and stealing and stuff like that were allowed society would be chaos, but that doesnt mean i have to belive in a god to have morals

The person you were ...
By: FranzDuckVideos. on 17 Sep 08, 23:56:56
The person you were talking to I call a Naive Atheist. He doesn't understand the concept of religion and, well, it's hard to explain. Now TFRT, if you didn't have the Bible, would do whatever you want? Would you kill a guy for looking? at you funny if you didn't have the Bible? The Bible doesn't give you any morals but subjective ones.

wow,? i hope hes ...
By: PraiseOurLordJesus. on 17 Sep 08, 22:32:57
wow,? i hope hes not going to turn into one of those columbine kids. who by the way were both athiests.

On VenomFangX, Thunderf00t, and others.
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 265 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I like ur videos ...
By: goboy100. on 16 Sep 08, 23:51:52
I like ur videos and you are entitled to your own beliefs. I'm also going to go? out on a limb and also say that i think ur cute. I know I'm going to hell.

A very? great point ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 16 Sep 08, 22:36:53
A very? great point, Russ.

SirTheist: ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 16 Sep 08, 19:30:00
SirTheist: Censoring is available, but it should not be taken? to the extent of VenomFangX's use of it. I.E. Censoring everyone except the kiss-asses. To the Atheistic Responders to SirTheistDRF: Please don't criticize theists, as I am one, the only beef with SirTheistDRF should be his belief in creationism, and that should be on a constructive criticism levels.

"I think? God would ...
By: Terrencje. on 16 Sep 08, 18:57:33
"I think? God would love to lose poeple like thunderf00t too." Because they look at nature instead of man-made scripture?

"I would love to ...
By: FSAthe1st. on 16 Sep 08, 17:37:12
"I would love to lose thunderf00t just like I would love? to lose satan, muslims, atheists, hindus, buddhists, etc. I think God would love to lose poeple like thunderf00t too." I worry about people like you. I worry that someone like you might try to garrot me alive just because I don't feel the need to believe in something that has no evidential support. The last thing I want is for one group of people who think they have God on their side to marginalise those of us who just want to get by.

"Censoring is not a ...
By: FSAthe1st. on 16 Sep 08, 17:36:27
"Censoring is not a problem." You would say that. You're a member of a majority who believes in the supernatural. "Venomfangx puts muslims? where they belong. He disproves their satanic/idiotic beliefs. fundementally, he does nothing more than that. Disproving does not breach the golden rule." So by your reasoning they're lesser human beings? And what's all this insanity with "Satan"?

Right I understand ...
By: TimeEffect. on 16 Sep 08, 16:40:26
Right I understand that but what's this about DMCA claims and Tf00t wanting to pursue? legal action? Did VFX get rid of Tf00t's two videos under the complaint of copyright material? And wasn't this false since the material was not copywritten?

It is because VFX ( ...
By: Terrencje. on 16 Sep 08, 09:05:28
It is because VFX (aka PCS) was once suspended because of anti-muslim videos. Many people including many atheists succeeded in getting his acc back. Then VFX just keeps censoring critisism and a a week or so back he tried to take down? videos of him by others (censorship to the next level). I find that really unacceptable...

Please know what ...
By: Konkaver. on 16 Sep 08, 07:26:24
Please know what the debate is: Atheists? are not pursuing a Christian, they are pursuing a Creationist.

As for the legal ...
By: TimeEffect. on 16 Sep 08, 06:45:11
As for the legal action I dont know HOW serious the assault is because I still dont understand the issue entirely. But I think that Tf00t is just being a baby about it and VFX needs to realize that his videos aren't copyrighted unless he files for it to be copyrighted. Someone please inform me on the history of this situation though, I am not entirely sure what has happened and will happen. My opinion stated above is purely based on what I think? happened, I dont know the whole story.

But seriously, I ...
By: TimeEffect. on 16 Sep 08, 06:42:33
But seriously, I dont want to lose either of them as well. Generally, atheists have been going hard and deep, they really want to crucify VFX out of cyberspace. It's not even about the law anymore, it's just a senseless fight, neither man will look past? his ego to put it behind them.

I would lose TF00t ...
By: TimeEffect. on 16 Sep 08, 06:39:35
I would lose TF00t too. In the words of? Joker, VFX is just too much fun to kill.

VenomFangX is a BIG FAT PHONY!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 95 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

For anyone unclear ...
By: themsfightinwoids. on 28 Dec 09, 03:56:10
For anyone unclear on whether VFX really did steal from Sick Kid's Hospital, please see? my accounts profile write-up for the proof.

CHOBITS713? IS A ...
By: stoopkid80. on 30 Jul 09, 22:29:05
CHOBITS713? IS A BIG FAT PHONY!

Then I think? alot ...
By: Sledge070685. on 04 Mar 09, 02:43:44
Then I think? alot of atheist should be like you.

believe different? ...
By: SiliousZeno. on 22 Jan 09, 21:51:15
believe different? things*

Im atheist and im ...
By: SiliousZeno. on 22 Jan 09, 21:50:03
Im atheist and im a? happy guy... Also i dont even talk about religion or try to prove it wrong to people because i dont see any need to. People should just believe what they want and get over the fact that other people believe or different things

LOL What a retarded ...
By: Eddii3. on 09 Jan 09, 22:27:44
LOL What a retarded comment. I am more? happy being an atheist seeing everything clearly

I'm an atheist, and ...
By: TakedaDemon. on 15 Dec 08, 02:00:09
I'm an atheist, and I'm very happy,? so sucks for you weird comment leaving guy!!

haha i say fuck a ...
By: hockeyfan888akajoker. on 28 Nov 08, 07:14:34
haha i say fuck a athiest haha ill diss em in a song actually i should write one? up right now peace out

great? vid
By: aquatania. on 12 Oct 08, 02:10:44
great? vid

haha,? funny vid :D
By: kais3rz3r0. on 04 Oct 08, 20:12:04
haha,? funny vid :D

haha I think he ...
By: jscience. on 15 Sep 08, 06:23:35
haha I think he did a pretty good job with the accent actually- it made his video a lot easier to listen to I want to dissect the way Thunderf00t speaks.? It really holds interest haha, good video though, it gave me a laugh

lol, I saw the ...
By: jscience. on 15 Sep 08, 06:17:38
lol, I saw the title and? had to click on the video probably a little shallow of me, but I'm here for entertainment I guess =)

Props.?
By: Xenithan. on 14 Sep 08, 10:55:29
Props.?

Besides, If a ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Sep 08, 06:11:58
Besides, If a Christian forgets a verse, does that make him NOT a Christian? No. That means that? they just FORGOT a verse. Jerk.

Hey Sirtheist, ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Sep 08, 05:48:05
Hey Sirtheist, don't be critical of my religion. Joy doesn't equal? happiness.

im atheist, and m? ...
By: Coremeister13. on 14 Sep 08, 04:32:05
im atheist, and m? happy, an di dont shove it down ppl's throats,

a lot of atheists ...
By: Coremeister13. on 14 Sep 08, 04:31:31
a lot of atheists on yt are rude and unhappy, the majority in real life are not, and? i am definetly a happy person so thats kind of a bias

migkillertwo, ...
By: theinquisitor. on 14 Sep 08, 03:30:34
migkillertwo, perhaps the fact that the screaming atheists get more attention than the calm polite ones has something to do with it. Here's a few youtube atheists who seem pretty happy and reasonable to me: KingHeathen, rozeboosje, ProfMTH, websnarf, mooeypoo, RabidApe, philhellenes, KT45, Razua77, GnosticAtheist, mickipedia, TheBadAstronomer, TheModestAgnostic, InReasonWeTrust, I could go on. But you probably? never heard of them because DRAMA is what gets you popular. Consider this.

Again... A LOT of ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Sep 08, 02:18:39
Again... A LOT of atheists are rude and un-happy, and I have put in a new annotation pointing this out, but not all of them? are.

"Always?" I ...
By: migkillertwo. on 14 Sep 08, 02:16:42
"Always?" I think about half of the atheists whom I have encountered? momentarily take a break from shouting obscenities.

The question was... ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Sep 08, 02:15:17
The question was... "Have you? ever seen an atheist who isn't always screaming obscenities?" Always?

"he doesn't scream ...
By: migkillertwo. on 14 Sep 08, 02:13:15
"he doesn't scream obscenities" well, yeah, tf00t? does use LOTS of obsceneties.

"I would agree to ...
By: migkillertwo. on 14 Sep 08, 02:12:53
"I would agree to an extent that a lot of atheists are un-happy and angry people though." that would be an understatement, a? major understatement. very nearly every atheist whom I have encountered (especially here on youtbe) was a foul-mouthed angry little person. every christian whom I have encountered here on youtube seems very generally happy.

It's not like I ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Sep 08, 02:10:25
It's not like I meet atheists on the street everyday who say that they're happy as ever, but I do know a few who? are very happy people. I would agree to an extent that a lot of atheists are un-happy and angry people though.

"I know a lot of ...
By: migkillertwo. on 14 Sep 08, 01:59:20
"I know a lot of atheists who are very happy" I need to know where you meet these atheists because I must second that commenter's sentiments, I have yet? to meet more atheists than I can count on my fingers who seem very happy and don't shout obscenities and go out of their way to be needlessly and gratuitously offensive towards believers in God.

2- Response to Scotzbhoy!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 497 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

ERV's are found in ...
By: benthemiester. on 05 Mar 11, 12:10:49
ERV's are found in all mammals & countless vertebrates. They play an extremely important role in mammalian embryology. Females mammals activate & produce massive amounts of ERV's during pregnancy to protect fetus from the mothers immunity response system. They also produce many of the needed Vfusion proteins during this stage. JUNK DNA is an outdated concept. Recent discoveries have shed new light on the role of this so called Junk DNA which? ERV's are a part of. Just a little correction.

wow....? unionkid?? ...
By: Knowntje. on 24 Oct 08, 18:20:12
wow....? unionkid?????? defending evolution? Wownever expected that. :)

again, corrupt ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 17 Sep 08, 05:08:45
again, corrupt government and bad administration. this is why you need a skeptical mind. you need to analyse the? data you get. you need to ask "can I trust this data?" and if you THINK LOGICALLY, you know you can't. you have much to learn, which is very obvious. the world is not like it is in your fantasy, Scotty.

Scotzbhoy, when ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 16 Sep 08, 21:36:08
Scotzbhoy, when should I be expecting your response to? be up, uploaded, processed, and online?

That? is either ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 21:21:55
That? is either ignorant or a complete lie. Crime rates are LOW in third world countries! The only violent crime that occurs in these countries is assult! In Ghana, for example, in 1997, there were 2.7 murders out of 100,000. That is the general trend.

So you expect me ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 21:20:29
So you expect me to? find sources for your claims?

watch?v=7rkWeyUURts ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 21:05:04
watch?v=7rkWeyUURts see, simply on YouTube, you don't even have to? look far.

ofcourse you won't ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 21:01:24
ofcourse you won't find my sources. you never do your research. I have to do all the? research, lazy bum. simply look around.

most US buildings ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 21:00:28
most US buildings are made of wood. not all, ofcourse, but most. if crimes were lower in Africa, there would be no raping, killing, stealing, etc. you obviously lie. AFRICA HAS LOTS OF CRIMES, FAR HIGHER THAN HERE! MOST AREN'T EVEN RECORDED BECAUSE OF THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS! not all bacteria cause diseases. simply look at your intestants. the oily layer of the skin protects us from most bacteria. if you wash, that layer is gone and needs 3 hours to be fully restored. so? don't wash too much.

No, you can't see ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 20:56:18
No, you can't see it. It illuminates. I'm not going to find your sources for you. You know about these, presumably you read it somewhere, so it should be easy? to simply tell me where.

You said, "almost ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 20:55:24
You said, "almost all buildings ther [USA] are made of wood, apart from the really important ones." This is simply not true. No, crime rates are far lower there than here. Generally, bacteria and other such microbes do cause disease.? Good hygene is essential for protecting against such microbes.

or do I? have to ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 20:52:08
or do I? have to lower to your level and explain it better?

are you now saying ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 20:51:46
are you now saying you can see UV light, scotty? don't change your claim or atleast admit your loss. and look it up,? I don't like doing your homework. what is it with theists thinking they're always right, despite the fact that all evidence points in the opposite direction?

- sorry, it isn't. ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 20:49:49
- sorry, it isn't. western European countries are better. we have less crimes, for example. also, I know not all buildings there are made of wood, I said MOST are made of wood. that's why they keep getting blown away by hurricanes, for example. yeah, they also have hunger, wars, religions, diseases, etc. still, more crimes happen? there than here. correction: not all bacteria cause diseases. in fact, when we wash, we destroy our oily protective layer on our skin. outside, we get tougher.

Here's something ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 20:47:45
Here's something else for you to chew on. Have you ever worn white clothes to a disco? You know how they glow? That's because of the UV light. Exactly the same principle with these moths which you haven't given me sources for. Saying "they might have colours which we can't see" is not disproving me. Oh lok, taking my crime in Africa thing out of context again. What is it with atheists and taking things out of context to discredit? them?

I cannot believe ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 20:45:07
I cannot believe I'm still arguing with you about this. The USA is almost undoubtedly the MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. And the buildings are? CERTAINLY not ALL made of WOOD, as you also claimed. Do you not think third world countries have more to worry about than raping each other? That is just foolish. When we wash, we rid ourselves of a lot of germs. Germs cause illnesses. When we are outside, there are even more germs, because it is not clean. Was that simple enough for you?

- US is one of? the ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 20:36:57
- US is one of? the first world countries, but not the most developed one of the world. - third world countries have far more crimes than first world countries. need I send you proof? - wrong, if you wash too often, you are far open to diseases and more likely to catch one. being outdoors regularly, hardens your body and makes you more resistance to a common cold, for example. LEARN STUFF, RETARD!

tell me, if moths ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 20:35:06
tell me, if moths couldn't see UV, then howcome they fly towards it, even? if you move it? blind people or even regular people won't see it and won't move towards it. my claim is based on actual facts and is well supported. your claim is not. you simply say "I can't see it, therefore it has no colors", while I prove you wrong. I said the US is less developed than western European countries. also, you thought there's no crime in Africa. stupid.

THE USA IS PROBABLY ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 20:34:48
THE USA IS PROBABLY THE MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD! Third world countries have far lower crime rates than first world countries. That's ridiculous. The more you wash, the? less likely you are to catch diseases. Spending time outdoors makes you even more seseptable.

the USA is less ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 20:32:22
the USA is less developed than western European countries. (lots of graphics for that) Africa has? most murders, rapes, theft, etc. than anywhere else. you fail to see the point, again. I said not washing TOO MUCH. people like to shower daily and wash several times a day. this is bad for the skin and your health. although hygiene is good, too much of it is bad. spending lots of time outdoors in proper conditions, makes you harder to the elements, making you more resistent to diseases.

You think moths ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 20:32:02
You think moths could only go towards something if they could see it? Why not run that idea past a blind person? There is no? evidence whatsoever that the whole spectrum has colours. It is an idea you're making up to try and account for your silly comments. I'M stupid? I'm not the one who thought America was a less developed country!

omFSM, you're ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 20:27:58
omFSM, you're stupid...scientists can make a strip of UV light on a wall, for example, and moths will be attracted to it. this can only happen if they can actually see it. also, we know that all the light we see, has a color. therefore, it is reasonable to believe that the rest of the EM-spectrum also has colors, which are just not within our viewable field. although "gamma" might not be a? color, gammarays CAN have a color. (which is very likely) sorry kid, you keep proving your stupidity.

Are you a moth? Are ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 20:23:23
Are you a moth? Are any of the scientists who tested them moths? Then it's not proven that they see UV.? When did I say that any part of visible light had no colour? Yes, cameras colour it, because it HAS NO COLOUR. None of this changes the fact that you stated that IR, UV, x-ray and gamma were ALL COLOURS in the EM spectrum.

actually, there IS ...
By: PJDesseyn. on 16 Sep 08, 19:45:19
actually, there IS proof that moths see UV. scientists tested it. and not with moths alone, btw. second: what part of the visible light? doesn't have any color? is there anything we don't consider a color? third, the camera colours it, so that we could see it. what's the point in a camera that sees infrared if it doesn't "translate" it so that we can see it?

Give me some time. ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 16 Sep 08, 19:40:45
Give me some time. My computer crashed. We have no proof that moths can see UV, firstly. Secondly, moths do not studys this stuff. The colours are called 'visible light' in the spectrum because it's the only part WE can see. Finally, being able to see other parts does not necessarily mean they are colours. For example, we have cameras that can detect infa red radiation, and the areas with lots of it show up? coloured, but that doesn't mean that is the colour. It means the camera colours the area.

Shawn Uses the Scare Tactics!?
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 41 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

shawn wants to ...
By: xlrxlr. on 20 Feb 09, 03:27:32
shawn wants to scare the lack of believe out? of us!?!?!?

I don't like how he ...
By: muzik313. on 02 Jan 09, 03:11:15
I don't like how he worded it but it's kind? of a serious concept.

good thing to see ...
By: Knowntje. on 24 Oct 08, 18:45:32
good thing to see that you dont want to use scare tactics to get people to convert. But the way I always have been presented the way to salvation is through scare tactics, namely to make sure that you believe that you deserve to be tortured forever? if you dont accept christ So how you would present the gospel message someone

he does use scare ...
By: MonkeyOctober. on 18 Oct 08, 18:53:57
he does use scare tactics. And VFX,I'm still ana theist.That video didn't scare the 'un-belief' out? of me.

*Yawn*... take? ...
By: KingKumaForever. on 17 Oct 08, 19:39:02
*Yawn*... take? this crap down. It's lame

If he is, he's not ...
By: GasMaskGuy343. on 22 Sep 08, 03:29:42
If he is, he's not very good? at it.

when will VFX learn ...
By: Elcristoph. on 14 Sep 08, 12:58:40
when will VFX learn that fear and proofs are pointless and dead forms of apologetics(spelling) as they give god no glory, people come to god through god speaking to there harts. if you base your faith on proofs then your faith? will only be as strong as the proof itself... thats the reason Im an Atheist, god hasnt spoken to me...its that simple..

Lolz. I assume that ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 13 Sep 08, 18:00:44
Lolz. I assume that you are talking about the deal with thunderf00t. I can't wait to see how this whole? deal pans out.

Hey VFX, you want ...
By: KaseyAkira. on 13 Sep 08, 14:46:12
Hey VFX, you want something scary? You're about to share a cell with a big black guy named Buba if you aint? left town by high noon on Tuesday. HIGH NOON BOY! *walks outta tha saloon, the spers on his boots rattling with each step, which soon fades into the distance*

Lolz, yeah it was ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 11 Sep 08, 19:33:57
Lolz, yeah it was pretty funny. VFX's sense of scary is the equivilant of my Kent Hovind's? sense of the truth.

Disagreed, but I ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 11 Sep 08, 19:33:21
Disagreed, but I take your point. Fundamental Christianity is? the problem, really.

I really didn't ...
By: DerivedApe. on 11 Sep 08, 14:41:48
I really didn't understand what was so scary about it. I watched it at 2 AM and the only reaction? I had was good chuckle. Especially the first growls. Apparently the demon is related to dolphins or orcas. Or perhaps it was one of the Jurassic Parks velociraptors. :P

Lol. The Bible is ...
By: LacrymalNirvana. on 11 Sep 08, 12:29:05
Lol. The Bible is one long horror novel. No demon voice could ever be as scary as the concept of a christian god. Christianity would never have? grown without scare tactics. It's nothing new.

But it's ok to ...
By: ukchristian28. on 11 Sep 08, 10:01:34
But it's ok to scare people for the right? reasons?

IT'S SCARE TACTICS ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 11 Sep 08, 03:09:16
IT'S SCARE TACTICS!? It's wrong to SCARE people into becoming a Christian for the WRONG reasons.

What's? wrong with ...
By: ukchristian28. on 11 Sep 08, 03:08:26
What's? wrong with that?

"Scare them out of? ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 11 Sep 08, 03:07:19
"Scare them out of? their un-belief?'

Define? "scare ...
By: ukchristian28. on 11 Sep 08, 00:50:32
Define? "scare tactics".

By using scare ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 10 Sep 08, 23:01:51
By using scare tactics?? No.

So, what are we ...
By: ukchristian28. on 10 Sep 08, 22:38:16
So, what are we saying? We shouldn't warn people about God's judgement? I suppose we should? criticise the apostle Paul and the Lord Jesus Himself then, because they certainly did.

Yeah Scotzbhoy,? ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 10 Sep 08, 22:19:40
Yeah Scotzbhoy,? what Rockandrock44 said was pretty on the ball, dude.

//It's really quite ...
By: rockandrock44. on 10 Sep 08, 22:07:44
//It's really quite concerning how theistic evolutionists show hatred? towards VenomFangX// Hared? No. Criticism? Yes. //He may be a creationist, but he posts excellent videos winning people to the lord// And doing so using scare tactics and decieving people is disingenious at best.

I just assumed that ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 10 Sep 08, 22:05:42
I just assumed that the reason TEs always bash him and appear to show such hatred towards him was because? he was a creationist. I'm sure if he was a TE, or didn't speak about creation and only made christian videos winning people to Christ, you would all be huge fans.

What? does this ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 10 Sep 08, 21:34:15
What? does this have to do with Creationism?

It's really quite ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 10 Sep 08, 21:31:02
It's really quite concerning how theistic evolutionists show hatred towards VenomFangX. He may be a creationist, but he posts excellent videos winning people to? the lord. I really think that we should all support him as christians, because he does a great job preaching the gospel message. Showing this kind of attitude towards him does not help.

Beddru of Japan is a Parallel with Jesus? No!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 122 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Well first of all, ...
By: patsybob. on 19 Mar 12, 18:50:04
Well first of all, Beddru is often considered a typing error most consider the deity to be Beddou. The Japanese language is known for its oddness, a mixture of native pronunciations incorporated with early Chinese (which had many dialects) leading to? kana and kanji. Likely they could have imported the deity from China or Korea, just like the entire Buddhist belief system into Japan. So it doesn't prove the deity never existed just because it doesn't follow the rules of Japanese language.

So do a lot of gods ...
By: patsybob. on 19 Mar 12, 16:00:45
So do a lot of gods from many countries, there's so many dating back from Ancient Egypt and across the? world from Europe, Africa, Asia!

What evidence do ...
By: saucersauce. on 19 Oct 11, 21:03:38
What evidence do you have that a virgin ever had a baby, anywhere? What evidence do you? have that anybody ever got up out of their grave, anywhere?

They've? got a lot ...
By: PurpleMilkcup. on 12 Oct 11, 05:26:40
They've? got a lot in common, they're both myths XD' and they share: resurection, performing miracles, 12 disciples, etc....

Bible? must never ...
By: PurpleMilkcup. on 12 Oct 11, 05:23:02
Bible? must never be literally interpreted ¬¬'

Umm...moron...Jesus ...
By: HomleandSecurity. on 11 Oct 11, 22:38:46
Umm...moron...Jesus is in the Bible. Thus, He? existed. Derp derp.

Only Jesus Christ ...
By: HomleandSecurity. on 11 Oct 11, 22:32:35
Only Jesus Christ and George Washington Christ were born of virgins. These other false gods? must be killed!

Only Jesus Christ ...
By: HomleandSecurity. on 11 Oct 11, 22:31:31
Only Jesus Christ and his brother, George Washington Christ, are the true Lords. Jesus and George Christ will be reborn in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania of the virgin Betsy Ross. When they? come back, America will finally rid itself of Moslems, queers, liberals, illegal immigrants and Satanic Darwinists.

Jesus didn't exist ...
By: PurpleMilkcup. on 07 Sep 11, 19:10:44
Jesus didn't exist neither... you're arguments are invaled... and what about misspellign by european first invaders? in english they call "Chinchou" to? "Jingzhou"... so di a bit more researching before emitting an opinion

Eastern writers ...
By: EyeofHorus33. on 10 Aug 11, 14:34:44
Eastern writers agree in placing the birth of Beddou 1027 BC. The doctrines of this god prevailed over Japan&China. According to belief: 'God's greatest incarnation was three 3,000 years ago, in the province of Cashmere, under the name of Beddou. He was thought to have sprung from a virgin of royal blood, who, when she became a? mother, continued to be a virgin; that the king, uneasy at his birth, was desirous he be put to death & caused all the males born at the same period be put to death!

Actually Yeshua ben ...
By: sterance2. on 05 Apr 11, 00:12:56
Actually Yeshua ben Yousef (Jesus son of Joseph) is a historically recognized figure in history, anyone who refutes that exhibits a terribly ignorant view on ancient and classical history. ? The debate isn't over his existence, it's over where or not he was of divine influence or origin.

Guys, guys, guys, ...
By: sterance2. on 05 Apr 11, 00:11:05
Guys, guys, guys, calm down! Just because other mythologies testify of Jesus Christ (though in admittedly distorted ways) doesn't mean they're evil or refutable. Look at the Egyptian god Horus (mostly from Memphite theology), the writings on him are practically verbatim with the verses? on Jesus, and that seems more like a prophecy to me. Then there's Quetzalcoatl of the Aztec mythology. There's MUCH more, but I'm running out of my allowed characters for this post. Just look it all up.

"The name of the ...
By: SuperAnimalDrummer. on 15 Jan 11, 11:42:05
"The name of the founder of Budhism has been spelled by European authors in the following modes, and probably in many others that have not come under my notice: Fo, Fod, Foe, Fohe, Fohi, Fho, Fuh, Futh, Pot, Pott, Poot, Poota, Pootah, Poth, Poti, Pout, Phuta, Wud, Bod, Bot, Bud, But, Buth, Budh, Buddh, Bood, Boodh,? Boudh, Bhood, Baoth, Bauth, Budo, Buto, Budud, Booda, Bodda, Budda, Butta, Budha, Buddha, Budhu, Buddhu, Budho, Buddho, Buddow, Bodhow, Budhoo, Budso, Budha, Boudha, Boudhu,..."

Beddru? is "Buddha. ...
By: SuperAnimalDrummer. on 15 Jan 11, 11:40:32
Beddru? is "Buddha." It's a mis-spelling. "his conclusion that "Beddru" is a typo - which I am quite sure is true - is based on the fact that the word "Beddru" only appears once in the book, on page 30, while the word "Beddou," which I am equally certain was Graves's original intention, appears three times, in Chapter 38, on pp. 372-373." From "Beddru is Beddou is Buddha" by DM Murdock

Where is the ...
By: haggardpeople. on 26 Aug 10, 05:50:17
Where is the historical evidence Jesus ever? existed? The Bible isnt a History book, its a Story book...

There is a LARGE ...
By: GnosticSage. on 02 Jul 10, 04:29:05
There is a LARGE Buddhist following in Japan. If it made it to China? from India, it found it's way 750 more miles to Japan.

Actually, there are ...
By: GnosticSage. on 02 Jul 10, 04:26:18
Actually, there are NO historical accounts of a real Jesus, the Christ.? Yes, there are mentions of a Nazarene, but the Nazarenes were a Jewish sect,as well as a people from Nazareth. Just like Lesbians can be either gay women or ANY person from Lesbos. There are also other arguments for this POV. If you want them, message me, but it's to late forme to feel like doing it now.

Also, in the Quran? ...
By: GTpanik. on 28 May 10, 16:02:52
Also, in the Quran? 19:36 Jesus said that Allah (God) is his lord,so worship him this is the straight path.

If Jesus is God, ...
By: GTpanik. on 28 May 10, 15:59:56
If Jesus is God, then tell me about Matthew? 21:11 and Luke 24:19 which states that he was a Prophet.

gay...?
By: franky1902. on 08 Apr 10, 16:40:42
gay...?

link? plz mah guru
By: Angelsdawn. on 01 Mar 10, 10:43:27
link? plz mah guru

Just see my ...
By: TheTravisPierson. on 28 Feb 10, 17:14:46
Just see my response to Angelsdawn's post. I don't feel like retyping my? sarcasm.

Yeah, there's only ...
By: TheTravisPierson. on 28 Feb 10, 17:13:36
Yeah, there's only several historical records of? Jesus from several countries, and the most bibliographically proven collection of documents in history by a landslide. No proof whatsoever.

Buddha was Indian. ...
By: TheTravisPierson. on 28 Feb 10, 17:10:06
Buddha was Indian. His philosophy caught on in China.? There's no Japan in this equation.

Hey Creationists! Go ahead... make my day!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 12 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

1- Response to Scotzbhoy!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 352 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

The Debate With Scotzbhoy!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 433 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

@truthforrealtruth ...
By: MARIOAnDrEs0. on 22 Mar 11, 19:39:37
@truthforrealtruth Elementary statistical theory shows that the probability of 200 successive mutations being successful is (½)200, or one? chance out of? 1060. The number 1060, if written out, would be "one" followed by sixty "zeros." In other words, the chance that a 200-component organism could be formed by mutation and natural selection is less than one chance out of a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion!

@turthforrealtruth ...
By: MARIOAnDrEs0. on 22 Mar 11, 19:38:37
@turthforrealtruth Elementary statistical theory shows that the probability of 200 successive mutations being successful is (½)200, or one chance out of 1060. The number 1060, if written out, would be "one" followed by sixty "zeros." In other words, the chance that a 200-component organism could? be formed by mutation and natural selection is less than one chance out of a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion!

meh, the grand ...
By: cheezit1314. on 03 Sep 08, 18:12:42
meh, the grand canyon supports an old earth, so its all good.?

Yeah, that's what? ...
By: jsnfx989. on 02 Sep 08, 21:52:45
Yeah, that's what? I said.

Sorry?
By: jsnfx989. on 01 Sep 08, 02:50:25
Sorry?

Well if you paid ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 31 Aug 08, 23:04:40
Well if you paid attention, we are debating on: The Big Bang Theory The Age of the Earth And Evolution vs.? Creation!

the grand canyon ...
By: cheezit1314. on 31 Aug 08, 22:43:33
the grand canyon is? easily proof that the Earth is older than 6000 years.

Btw. . .The Grand ...
By: jsnfx989. on 31 Aug 08, 20:23:49
Btw. . .The Grand Canyon isn't proof of evolution. It's proof of an Old Earth. Those other things were? proof of evolution though

RMD is near 100% ...
By: TheBigGameHunter1. on 30 Aug 08, 14:34:14
RMD is near 100% when they use various samples at different test centers.?

truthforrealtruth ...
By: TheBigGameHunter1. on 30 Aug 08, 14:33:09
truthforrealtruth Normal people accept the truth like you do, idiots like him will not learn, just deny the? truths they dont like.

It would be more ...
By: Saukko31. on 30 Aug 08, 07:12:00
It would be more accurate to say that evolution has been proven beyond reasonable doubt, and creationism has been disproven long? time ago, and over and over again. ;)

Lol,? yeah, ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 30 Aug 08, 01:41:48
Lol,? yeah, unexpected.

Sounds good, dude.?
By: truthforrealtruth. on 30 Aug 08, 00:54:40
Sounds good, dude.?

Sorry for the poor ...
By: scotzbhoy. on 30 Aug 08, 00:51:04
Sorry for the poor intro man. I'll explain a bit? in my response.

I posted a few ...
By: Terrencje. on 30 Aug 08, 00:40:27
I posted a few questions in one of his videos, I hope I get them answered while he? is not to busy with you. I'm also making a critical analysis of his videos to start of with videoposting. gl with the debate.

Endogenous Retroviruses: Explained!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 127 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

can u give me a ...
By: SHIBBYiPANDA. on 28 Dec 10, 07:02:57
can u give me a good video that refutes this or paper? or something?? I'm not asking out of sarcasm nigga I'm just asking out of honest curiousity...

Yah ole Nephy has a ...
By: cruiserhog1. on 11 Jul 10, 14:00:33
Yah ole Nephy has a video up where he says they can jump around in the DNA....then to top if off he picks and ERV that doesnt share a loci in humans but fails to mention we are immune to it due to a antibody presence... This HAS NOT been refuted, its been proven to be consistent throughout the ape lineage and exhibits proportional? descent with modification.

you mean dimetrodon ...
By: patrickledford420. on 19 Jun 10, 19:12:03
you mean dimetrodon or? any of the other synapsids and therapsids

refuting ERVs ...
By: grfield1. on 30 Apr 10, 09:33:50
refuting ERVs endogenous? retroviruses part 1 Search this on youtube....I don't know why youtube will not allow me to post a link...especially to a youtube clip...

"So I look? at ...
By: LaingGod. on 30 Jan 10, 03:54:10
"So I look? at facts." Coming from a creationists I can't LOL any harder.

It is not a matter ...
By: phicomingatya. on 29 Jan 10, 22:44:18
It is not a matter of what I believe. 'Cause that's opinion, and opinions can differ. So I look at facts. You should try too. And think for yourself. Based on facts I know evolution is a creative man made idea/invention.? But it never happened. No reptile group ever evolved into mammals over time.

That's cause you're ...
By: LaingGod. on 29 Jan 10, 22:31:59
That's cause you're a fucking retard. (No offense to retards)?

No, evidence, proof ...
By: LaingGod. on 29 Jan 10, 22:29:42
No, evidence, proof and science.?

If? you believe the ...
By: LaingGod. on 29 Jan 10, 22:27:26
If? you believe the Earth is only 6000 years old you.......might be a redneck.

I've been making " ...
By: altoidjunkie. on 01 Jun 09, 23:51:04
I've been making "decent" arguments this whole time. You've just been ignoring them. And evolution doesn't rely on a lack of evidence for creationism. It was created because geological and biological evidence suggest its truth. You've got it backwards. But no bother, anyone with half a brain can read our argument and make the right conclusion. And? the rest of our DNA remains intact because if the important parts become defective or degrade then the organism doesn't survive. I'm done here now.

Well, if evolution ...
By: phicomingatya. on 01 Jun 09, 23:22:47
Well, if evolution is supported by science as much as you claim, then why can't you use some descent arguments? If you have to rely on? lack of evidence for creation, then your theory is lame as can get. Tell me now, how does recombination and deletion delete over 90% of ERV insertions but leave over 90 percent of the rest of our DNA intact??? Here you have it. This supports creation over evolution. But you use your evolutionists tactic and simply ignore the facts. Well, believe what you want to

Also, the ERVs can ...
By: altoidjunkie. on 01 Jun 09, 21:16:55
Also, the ERVs can be deleted over time? through a process called recombinational deletion that occurs during replication. So after millions of years, many of the ERVs have been deleted or become unrecognizable through degradation and mutation.

A typical ...
By: altoidjunkie. on 01 Jun 09, 21:11:51
A typical evolutionist comment? Evolution is the ONLY rational explanation for the rise of man with ANY scientific evidence to? support it. There is nothing that indicates creationism whatsoever. The only ammunition you loonies have is to attack what is not YET known about evolution. And if you truly believe that it's unfathomable that human being can arise without a designer, then what designed God? Creationism has the exact same hole that you think exists in evolution.

A typical ...
By: phicomingatya. on 01 Jun 09, 08:34:42
A typical evolutionists comment, which serves only to hide their stupidity. We should have the majority of the ERVs of this common ancestor in common, should't we?? And that's a whole lot more than the number of ERV insertions after human and himps split. Now quit your silly comments and acknoledge your mistake.

Actually, humans ...
By: altoidjunkie. on 01 Jun 09, 07:27:16
Actually, humans didn't even evolve directly from chimps but share a common ancestor from five or six million years ago. So yeah, no billions.?

You dare to accuse ...
By: phicomingatya. on 01 Jun 09, 02:28:55
You dare to accuse me of fallacy? With what argument? That of an idiot! How many billion years of shared history you claim we got in common with chimps compared to the little time after you claim humans and chimps diverged??? Why then do you accept we do not have more common? ERVs (same in same spot) than unshared ones?

That's a logical ...
By: altoidjunkie. on 01 Jun 09, 00:25:16
That's a logical fallacy (non-sequiter). We would only? share the same ERVs with THE INDIVIDUAL chimp that fathered/mothered the primate that led to the evolution of man. Chimps born since then will have acquired new ERVs and human beings have also acquired new ones. There should be a very large number of unshared ERVs.

Suppose now that ...
By: phicomingatya. on 15 May 09, 11:58:06
Suppose now that the theory of common descent between chimps and humans is true. We share over 90% of our dna. So why not over 90% of ERVs. Now ERVs do mutate, so let's say only 10% of ERVs we have in common. So that's like 9,000 shared ERVs integration sites that we should expect. Now guess what? How many have? we found so far? No more than 14 !?!!! So definitely, the common descent predictions cannot possible hold. ERVs show that much. Evolution has been disproven. But nice try :P

Let me explain this ...
By: phicomingatya. on 15 May 09, 11:56:36
Let me explain this. Every ERV infection in our genome has 90,000 out of 100 million chance to be at? an exact same spot as in chimps. That is 9 out of 10,000 for each ERV infection in the human gnome. Now consider we have about 90,000 ERV integration points. Then we have to multiply that with 9/10,000 to get the expected number that is at exactly the same integration sites.

You've been an ...
By: phicomingatya. on 15 May 09, 11:47:11
You've been an creationist once. How about considering going back again, lol. ERV is definitely proof against common descent. If there's close to 90,000 ERVs found in humans, and we estimate the same amount for chimps in roughly 100 million slots, then 9 out of every 10,000 slots in chimps is occupied. So how many do we expect to fall in the same slot if we put 90,000 ERVs in our slots? That's right:? roughtly 80 ERVs at the exact same slot.

How, when and by? ...
By: ScientiaPerceptum. on 24 Dec 08, 14:45:24
How, when and by? whom where???

How, when and? by ...
By: ScientiaPerceptum. on 24 Dec 08, 14:42:37
How, when and? by whom where???

here? watch this ...
By: kut77less. on 24 Dec 08, 06:06:44
here? watch this video /watch?v=SShGG0VGqXw

Human tissues that ...
By: kut77less. on 24 Dec 08, 06:06:08
Human tissues that lack HERV transcription could not be found, confirming that human endogenous retroviruses are permanent components of the human transcriptome. Distinct activity patterns may reflect the characteristics of the regulatory machinery in these cells, e.g., cell type-dependent occurrence of transcriptional regulatory factors. ERVs that cause cancer are? likely to be transposable elements (of which ERVs are a subset) gone wrong. They would be a product of the Fall.

The Grand Canyon and the Flood of Noah!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 108 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Now, respond to my ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 21:40:11
Now, respond to my four statements? made in this video.

faults (Winker and ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 21:39:46
faults (Winker and Kidwell 1986). Sediments? have also accumulated elsewhere. Some were deposited in flood plains between the delta and the Grand Canyon.

The Colorado River ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 21:39:27
The Colorado River delta itself is quite extensive. It covers 3,325 square miles (Sykes 1937) and is up to 3.5 miles deep (Jennings and Thompson 1986), containing over 10,000 cubic miles of the Colorado River's sediments from the last two to three million years. The sediments that were deposited by the river more than? two to three million years ago have been shifted northwestward by movement along the San Andreas and related

What are the odds ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 21:10:09
What are the odds that they all agree? 80% yes, 20% no. So we are pretty sure, yes. Why don't you? refute my four claims I made in this video before we move on.

We observe what we ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 17:58:26
We observe what we find to be truth. What are the odds that they all agree and yet they are all wrong? 80%? right and 20% wrong. If the colorado river formed the grand canyon correctly, then we would assume it to be in order, yes.

Science agrees to ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 17:23:46
Science agrees to it, and? science can be trusted. They are all in order! It all fits, and the genes help, not just the look. That's a cop-out.

SirTheistDRF, Yes, ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 17:05:35
SirTheistDRF, Yes, I am sure of all of those things. You think 20% beats 80%, you think that transitional fossils are just a test from God, and you won't? admit that an ERV ending up in the SAME PLACE which is 1/1 TRILLION and more odds, is impossible.

endogenous ...
By: jtyranus. on 25 Aug 08, 05:39:12
endogenous retroviruses are viral dna that is left in a genome. sometimes when a virus inserts its dna into a genome it fails to replicate and the viral dna is stuck in the genome. sometimes this happens in a germline cell thus all subsequent generations will have the viral? dna at the same insertion site. humans and chimps have the same viral dna at the same insertions sites in their genomes. this shows that humans and chimps share common ancestry.

What makes you ...
By: djarm67. on 25 Aug 08, 05:14:53
What makes you believe that the unconformity cannot form by slow? erosion? An unconformity is simply where strata ceases to be in a deposition zone or it can be in a deposition zone but is then subsequently eroded. This eroded strata then becomes subject to deposition again. Please provide evidence to back up this claim that unconformities cannot form by slow erosion.

ERV's,? ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 04:39:12
ERV's,? transitional fossils and radiometric dating to name only three!!!

Sirtheist... You ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 03:41:46
Sirtheist... You admitted to Kabane that you got? beat on endogenous retroviruses, because you repeated the same thing 10 times over and over, so don't make a conclusion like that when nearly everyone around you disagrees with you.

Not? conclusive.
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 03:30:28
Not? conclusive.

I have heard of it. ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 03:17:39
I have heard of it. All I know is that there is a slight gap? in the grand canyon, but I don't know too much about it. And considering that there isn't much on youtube or google from creationists or from evolutionists, I would go to the extent to say that it's not a very strong argument against the evolutionists.

Yes, I have.?
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 02:49:37
Yes, I have.?

Lolz @? Atriviality.
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 02:36:46
Lolz @? Atriviality.

No, erosion and ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 25 Aug 08, 02:13:14
No, erosion and deposition.?

"Huh? What am I ...
By: Atriviality. on 25 Aug 08, 01:30:02
"Huh? What am I assuming?" - That creationists are capable of comprehending evidence and reality in general.? That's too much of an assumption to make.

Huh? What? am I ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 24 Aug 08, 23:55:35
Huh? What? am I assuming?

The Local Flood of Noah!
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 132 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

"Spreading the ...
By: jtyranus. on 19 Aug 08, 00:07:29
"Spreading the gospel of? Love" then why dont people do that instead of trying to prove the flood happened?

Lolz, good luck. ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 21:21:12
Lolz, good luck. Most start spewing out bible? verses, as if that'll prove it, I display in this video that the bible can allow for either, now it's down to personal opinion.

Why? What's the ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 20:50:16
Why? What's the difference?? I don't use my mic for anything but videos and stickam. I rarely use my mic for paltalk.

Why? Because you ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 19:58:59
Why? Because you know you will lose? If it's because you? have friends over, we can debate later.

I want? a text ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 19:49:45
I want? a text debate.

Then get on paltalk ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 19:46:16
Then get on paltalk like I have asked you too, sirtheist, and let's? see if you can squirm your way out of a debate with me.

The Cheetah Problem ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 19:43:37
The Cheetah Problem? Sorry, not too fond of it.?

How did I get owned ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 19:42:32
How did I get owned? Coon, you have no clue how to debate. In fact, I want to debate you right now. I am sick of the creationist ignorance!?

Maybe you should ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 19:09:45
Maybe you should follow the link on the screen towards the end of my? video.

IDK,? Watch the ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 19:02:06
IDK,? Watch the video, and maybe you will find out.

Who is to say that ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 18 Aug 08, 19:01:54
Who is to say that there? were?

I must disagree ...
By: Andrewkinghorn15. on 18 Aug 08, 17:29:49
I must disagree with you? there.

Why do? you doubt a ...
By: Andrewkinghorn15. on 18 Aug 08, 17:29:25
Why do? you doubt a Global Flood. I am a Creationist.

Excellent!? I ...
By: ukchristian28. on 18 Aug 08, 16:51:04
Excellent!? I agree 100%! Well done!

Love and Hatred
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 655 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Responding to Jrsbarker, on Archaeopteryx
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 594 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

VenomFangX Needs a Science Textbook - Part 5
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 660 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

VenomFangX Needs a Science Textbook - Part 4
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 559 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

VenomFangX Needs a Science Textbook - Part 3
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 632 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

VenomFangX Needs a Science Textbook - Part 2
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 525 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

- "-"Altruism? ...
By: dingodavid. on 26 Nov 11, 02:30:20
- "-"Altruism? Altruism is the failure of life it'self. Now sacrificing yourself for your loved? ones is okay, but not for random people." Evolution predicts that we will feel more? attached to our closest relatives. Glad I don't belong to your family.

"An atheist with ...
By: xUltimaProductionsx. on 06 Sep 08, 22:03:25
"An atheist with morals is not being consistent with their worldview." Are you out of your mind? Honestly, this is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Usually I don't respond to these kinds of videos since there is no winning, but this is outrageous. In today's society morals come naturally with laws, school, etc, no? matter what your religion or beliefs. In the bible, it says you're allowed to buy slaves, kill people who work on the sabbath, etc. Does that sound moral to you?

Interusting, thank? ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 14 Aug 08, 10:44:08
Interusting, thank? you.

In the terms of ...
By: BobbyBBobson. on 14 Aug 08, 06:58:05
In the terms of evolution, altruism is a greater good for all the organisms. An example is vampire bats. sometimes, one bat cannot get enough food, so the others share their blood. now that is a negative effect to them. however, such starvation may later plague those who share, and since they share, they will be able to receive blood from the society due to their participation in said society. if they did not share they would have a more? difficult time surviving and passing on genes.

But then again, It ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 12 Aug 08, 09:54:27
But then again, It would be a selfless act. I guess it's okay then. BUT, If it is to save... say a 30 year old man who you don't even know, then I think? that is wrong.

If you know that ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 12 Aug 08, 09:53:31
If you know that child, but not if you have? no clue who that child is.

Altruism? Altruism ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 11 Aug 08, 19:23:08
Altruism? Altruism is the failure of life it'self. Now sacrificing yourself for your loved ones? is okay, but not for random people, like Altruism states is okay.

VenomFangX did make ...
By: ukchristian28. on 11 Aug 08, 00:17:17
VenomFangX did make a very valid point actually. Atheism cannot account for morality. Without belief in God is there no objective moral standard or code by which to measure what is right or? wrong. An atheist with morals in not being consistant with their worldview. So he was making a good argument against atheism there, but not against evolution.

VenomFangX Needs a Science Textbook - Part 1
Posted by: truthforrealtruth

Video duration: 648 seconds

Related: N/A

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Never underestimate ...
By: dingodavid. on 26 Nov 11, 02:06:48
Never underestimate the stupidity of? young-earth creationists like VenomFangX.

'The lad doth ...
By: dingodavid. on 26 Nov 11, 01:29:25
'The lad doth protest too much, methinks.' - William? Shakespeare, 'Hamlet'

VFX is insane.? ...
By: aaronzvz. on 08 Apr 11, 19:12:13
VFX is insane.? Nothing more to it.

I love Venomfangs? ...
By: Durlug. on 23 Feb 09, 20:44:14
I love Venomfangs? videos, try to post on them and question his arguments and beliefs. It gets denied because of his pending for approval process. Talk about self centered religious crack.

I'd be suprised if ...
By: edgey642. on 09 Feb 09, 17:06:00
I'd be suprised if he doesnt? approve as i think he actually 'believes' he IS god

One guy wrote " ...
By: madzyzome. on 08 Feb 09, 23:52:53
One guy wrote "This? video is completely true.? It is fact. It is impossible for VFX to be wrong." I think he missed the sarcasm. I replied with "VFX IS GOD!!!!" Lets see if he approves it.

actually he reads, ...
By: IchigoGodOfWar. on 03 Feb 09, 01:09:47
actually he reads, it and after reading it deletes it, because i think he passes it off as either, "Jesus-bashing" insulting, unethical or? false"

You notice on ...
By: edgey642. on 07 Jan 09, 18:39:15
You notice on Venomfangx's videos he only approves comments from christians/creationists who praise his work... not one comment from an evolutionist or anyone who disagrees with? him. Typical bible basher, will not listen to anyone else but expect you to listen to him... COCK!

LOL Wasn't a death ...
By: Nevaeh225. on 13 Sep 08, 13:12:51
LOL Wasn't a death threat, more of a dream...a? man can dream, a man can only dream....*Tear*

Oh noes Nevaeh225 ...
By: Roxsith. on 11 Sep 08, 17:13:13
Oh noes Nevaeh225 deaththreats, he nearly stopped youtubeing over those, so keep it up :P i however would love a nother fate for him. may he loose his use of speach and be infertile, making sure he can no longer object to reason, and insuring that he can pass the stupidity ball to his kids. omfg ! thats a horrible thought to be brought up by him.. i think ill go slit my wrists? now

And I know that ...
By: Nevaeh225. on 11 Sep 08, 14:56:19
And I know that some? Christians aren't ignorant like VenomFangX, but in that particular instance, I was talking specifically about,and to him. Not the followers of your religion.

Umm, that seems to ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 10 Sep 08, 04:33:48
Umm, that seems to be the atheist attitude that makes Christians angry. Shawn is ignorant,? plain and simple, and in the definitive sense of the word. And as for the bible, I believe in the bible, and it's considered very reliable for Christianity!

VenomFangX is one ...
By: Nevaeh225. on 10 Sep 08, 04:14:17
VenomFangX is one of those few rare people that should be killed off to better the progression of humans as a race. He REFUSES to listen to anything but his? 2000 year old book of lies. Just hit him about the face with a heavy piece of mining equipment until he stops moving.

altimita, I am? a ...
By: truthforrealtruth. on 07 Sep 08, 02:31:13
altimita, I am? a Christian.

Exactly what I ...
By: xUltimaProductionsx. on 06 Sep 08, 21:48:38
Exactly what I thought when I was watching it!?

"I'm a Christian" ...
By: altimita. on 04 Sep 08, 05:42:03
"I'm a Christian" Then he talks about Atheists I? make the meaning for my life. "I don't say that." Are you Atheist or Christian...? Not this perticular example, but there a couple times where this seems to happen. You stumble back and forth between two things. Not bad with the rest though. Just something to think about. Nice rebuttal.

this venomfangx guy ...
By: astronautsandwitch. on 10 Aug 08, 20:37:13
this venomfangx guy is really retarded and what most people don't realize is that this is his own problem.I do not think that talking to him will fix his problem. Anyway,you say you are christian? bu then again how do you reconcile all the other mistakes in? the bible? Like you have the right to buy slaves, you should also kill everyone who works sabath? women' rights? and on and on like the fact that jesus did not die?

Good rebuttal? man. ...
By: rockandrock44. on 10 Aug 08, 20:13:46
Good rebuttal? man. Keep it up. Peace

Wow!! VenomfangX ...
By: hankandbobby. on 10 Aug 08, 10:20:44
Wow!! VenomfangX realy has really lost his mind. I just thought he was a little? (actually a lot) misguided.

Electronic Cigarette Videos

Search

Electronic Cigarette Related Videos

Electronic Cigarette Sponsors