Latest videos by valeriereified | Electronic Cigarette Videos

======================================
Try Ecigarette For FREE At http://tryecigarette.com
======================================

Something Something Trans-Liberation... Can I go Back to Bed Now?
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 493 seconds

A Special Comment on the Politics of Fat in America
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 374 seconds

To Leezabo On the T-word, My Rules, and Being a Non-Transitioned Trans Woman... (we all were once)
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 571 seconds

As my girlfriend said to me the day we met and after I'd been going on about this Cajun place I love: "You were never a boy."

Related: trans, non-transitioned, hormones dont make a woman

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Forget the Ad Hominem Attacks On J. Michael Bailey.
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 926 seconds

There are excellent scientific attacks that can be engaged, because he really did employ some excellently shitty science here.

Related: autogynephilia, j. michael bailey, transphobic bullshit, trans women

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

The University Wage Premium: Does it Adequately Reward Productivity?
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 257 seconds

If each additional year of education yields fewer and fewer results in terms of increased productivity, then why are we paying the highest premium for those who take 17 years of schooling over 13?
Also, not for nothin' but a Nobel-Prize Winner does seem to support my argument here:
http://www.nytime s.com/2011/03/07/opi nion/07krugman.html

Related: wages, work, education, university, income inequality

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Some Ground Rules
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 412 seconds

If you're going to post on my channel, it's not going to be graffiti, you'll have to back it up. Welcome to the advanced class kids.

Related: debate, standards, argument, fairness

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I don't drive, live ...
By: valeriereified. on 06 Aug 11, 23:00:56
I don't drive, live in a concrete highrise which suffers far less heat loss than single detatched? homes and thus have a 6 ton carbon footprint even with my extra 1000 calories of Basal Metabolic Rate. The average Canadian has a 22 ton carbon footprint. The global average is four. Get your fucking facts straight before you spread your middle-class assumptions about the place.

I'm a member of the ...
By: Meowbay. on 06 Aug 11, 22:23:56
I'm a member of the VHEMT ever since the nineties, but one of the things making it very hard to respect you is the fact that you're really heavyweight for someone nagging about suffering on the expense of new life. Ending your over-consumption habits could easily compensate for about 5 extra? humans on this planet. Please, start by eating less, then promote anti-natalism and I would buy your reasoning in favor of it.

thanks i will ...
By: JCmultiverse. on 14 Jul 11, 10:57:17
thanks i will research? filibuster ..i like to ask simple questions hence my question do you subscribe to the free press ..if yes..fine..if .no..fine too..thanks

A forum is? not ...
By: valeriereified. on 14 Jul 11, 09:12:39
A forum is? not always a dialogue. Ever hear of a filibuster? Where someone will continue talking to arrest progress while not talking directly about the issue in question? Tell me: 1. Is drowning the debate in esoteric topics and disingenuous arguments an expression of freedom? Why? 2. Is the modern newspaper an exercise in constraints on freedom? If so, demostrate a paper without editors. I encourage you to take more than 500 characters and reply via blog. Publish the URL/vid.

. aha.. good... now ...
By: JCmultiverse. on 14 Jul 11, 09:03:18
. aha.. good... now tell me the difference between monologue and dialogue... (given that a? book is monologue) and a forum (dialogue)..thanks

If I'm writing a ...
By: valeriereified. on 14 Jul 11, 08:22:33
If I'm writing a book, I don't let people scribble in the margins. If I'm editing a paper, I will only publish work that's up to my standards. If everyone can publish, the only 'constraints' are on vandalizing someone's work. A free press decides what letters to the editor to publish; spam filter: Constraint? You understand that you can create your own forum? You don't have a right to my audience, you have a right to any audience you build, and can dispense with? it as you choose.

.. great.. thanks.. ...
By: JCmultiverse. on 14 Jul 11, 08:16:12
.. great.. thanks...is ""able to set their own journalsitic standadrds""? a euphemism for "constraints"... keeping in mind that freedom means "no constraints ""

Hmm... wouldn't you ...
By: valeriereified. on 14 Jul 11, 08:12:19
Hmm... wouldn't you rather tell me what women feel? Freedom of the press: When three factors exist: 1. Freedom from legal restrictions on speech save slander and libel. 2. A publisher is generally free to publish stories they feel are important, and able to set their own journalistic standards for their stories, free from government or investor influence, save for contract renewal. 3. Means? of publication are broadly accessible. I.E anyone can start one relatively cheaply.

good points... can ...
By: JCmultiverse. on 14 Jul 11, 08:05:48
good points... can you clearly and unambiguously declare your position on ""freedom of the press"".. because this is a hot issue for me .. I live in a constrained world and I like many others have made this a life mission.. thanks?

Because I do defend ...
By: valeriereified. on 14 Jul 11, 02:31:27
Because I do defend your right to say it. Just not on my channel. That is a concept known? as editorial control. I set a basic standard of civility in my publications. You are free to set up your own publication. You have internet access, the same as I do. You have your printing press with which you can articulate your ideas and get your audience. You do NOT have an inherent right to piggyback on my viewership and readership. Record your own damn vids. A webcam & mike is 20 bucks.

...why not take the ...
By: JCmultiverse. on 13 Jul 11, 21:53:41
...why not take the open Voltaire approach.."I may disagree with what you say- but will defend to death your right to say? it "...let me give you another example -- Do you think Tunisian and Egyptian autocracies would have fallen if the people played by the rules ?... if we look at all the revolutions in history -- who played by the rules to achieve our state of freedom ??... Question -- Do you subscribe to "Freedom of the Press ??"".. and I mean FREEDOM =no constraints..jc

Rigor always does, ...
By: valeriereified. on 13 Jul 11, 19:55:31
Rigor always does, but I'll summarize. - You must respect neutral terminology and subjective self-definition. - You must be willing to defend your position if asked. - You must engage evidence, and cannot discredit it simply because of its origins. - Calling someone's argument specious is? acceptable, but you must explain why. Pretty easy.

too many? rules-- I ...
By: JCmultiverse. on 13 Jul 11, 11:00:47
too many? rules-- I think you risk creativity

On Trans, On Choice, And There is No Normal
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 1069 seconds

Progressives who wanted greater bodily freedom used to use, "my body, my choice," as a mantra...
When did authenticity get tied up in innateness?

Related: authenticity, trans, hbs, subversivism, choice

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Nora Vincent Rehashes the same old Cis-Subversivist Meme and calls it Radicalism
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 508 seconds

Any frustration you may read in this video is directed at Ms. Vincent, not leeszabo. I'm just answering the question of why someone might not like Ms. Vincent's work.
PS Leesabo: You seem pretty kewl. Also I used to have a room like that. They're cozy though messy.

Related: subersivism, cissexism, trans 101

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

I May Not Care for Men But I Care Less For How They Are Treated
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 572 seconds

When those talking about the pitfalls of tying socio-economic status to gender realize that in addition to viewing women as pieces of mean, the patriarchy views the men who don't rule as meat shields, we might begin to find a way to deal with the root causes. That or we'll let college professors beat up on gas jockeys and call it feminism.

Related: gendered condesension, misplaced misandry

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Six people wish I ...
By: valeriereified. on 02 Sep 11, 23:55:26
Six people wish I were? more sexist against men.

It's not hard to ...
By: valeriereified. on 09 Jul 11, 01:21:23
It's not hard to determine the general thrust from your channel's history. Instead of being a progressive and? anti-'patriarchy' or whatever you want to call it MRA, you're allying yourself with people conflating institutional oppressions with social institutions. Frankly it's rather insulting to a Tory like me to have someone simply send graffiti instead of engage in debate. It's unworthy.

Like? I said, I've ...
By: apekillssnake. on 08 Jul 11, 19:44:47
Like? I said, I've no interest in having a dialogue with you. The previous comments you have just left show I'm a lot more studied than you on a subject you psychologically think you have involved yourself in. Besides you would not be able to accept the truth, so really there is little point. It's funny when you said- "how about engaging with something more than ad hominems" when you then proceeded yourself to use them, proving you have huge inconsistency of mind as in the upload

I can freely admit ...
By: valeriereified. on 08 Jul 11, 19:06:50
I can freely admit my prejudices without ever for a second thinking men should be treated as less than? human or have their rights curtailed in comparison to mine. Would that you and your bible-except-for-the-parts-where-Jesus-treats-the-gender-variant-with-respect-and-the-parts-about-where-eating-shrimp-and-wearing-jackets-with-fleece-liners-are-equivalent-abominations-to-your-bogeymen bashing friends could do the same.

lol, as a humanist, ...
By: apekillssnake. on 08 Jul 11, 11:30:57
lol, as a humanist, that is a great title? for your upload!

@apekillssnake As ...
By: valeriereified. on 08 Jul 11, 03:27:18
@apekillssnake As a humanist,? I expect that not everyone's thought processes are universal and that often explaining to your intended audience references made is necessary.

Not really, as a ...
By: apekillssnake. on 07 Jul 11, 20:45:23
Not really, as a behaviorist I already had my research proven to? me in what you said!

Not so far as I ...
By: valeriereified. on 07 Jul 11, 20:14:53
Not so far as I know... would you like to engage with something more? than ad hominem?

Is? this one of ...
By: apekillssnake. on 01 Jul 11, 09:00:02
Is? this one of those suicide channels!?

lovely??
By: IChoseTheRedPill. on 30 Jun 11, 00:21:16
lovely??

Oh the adhominem... We Anti-natalists are not what you have decided we are.
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 774 seconds

We're not the anti-life equivalent of pro-lifers
We're not areligious religious nuts
And, hey, we understand that technology marches on and that malthusian equivalence can be grown beyond, just like Paul Krugman does.

Related: anti-natalism, ad hominem, womb cult

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

That's my position, ...
By: valeriereified. on 22 Nov 11, 00:57:49
That's my position, save? for the dicey question of how to equitably place the costs of having children on those having children without impoverishing the children... if we had a guaranteed annual income the GAI that children got could be placed in an account which handled schooling and incidentals, which would put them in the position of enjoying a non-fungible higher standard of living... again, I'm not sure.

: Well, I'm not a ...
By: pyrrho314. on 22 Nov 11, 00:43:21
: Well, I'm not a fan of Plato but that's besides the point. I agree with you, and in this vein I agree with gary that America should see to it that we have ridiculously good, even over the top good, orphanages to address this sort of problem. and I also would like to say that regulating natalism to some degree is well justified on environmental grounds because these address the cost to OTHERS of procreation. I just? reject the "potential cost to children" as universally valid.

If we had a ...
By: valeriereified. on 21 Nov 11, 23:45:49
If we had a sustainable environment to take care of all the HUMANS then yes, I would be less? concerned about fertility. If we had a system which didn't punish children for being born to poor parents, I would be less concerned about their birth. I'm not saying: Do this for the environment. I'm saying: Do this for the SPECIES by not cratering the environment. Let that be your legacy to the human race. Plato didn't have children. You think we're weaker as a species for him writing The Republic?

I don't? believe ...
By: valeriereified. on 21 Nov 11, 23:38:33
I don't? believe there should be a law restricting someone's personal choice and where on earth did you get that from the video?! I said that in this day and age having children was a manifestly selfish and personal choice. How is that different from mealy-mouthed Democrats who call every abortion a tragedy, save the fact that I'm clearly not trying to placate a voting bloc when I say: Every child is both a tragedy and a precious and sacred societal obligation.

so you think the ...
By: pyrrho314. on 21 Nov 11, 21:19:24
so you think the ideal cost to the environment for a human is zero? And that's "humanism"? If we had a sustainable? system you wouldn't mind natalism?

That's my position, ...
By: valeriereified. on 22 Nov 11, 00:57:49
That's my position, save for the dicey question of how to equitably place the costs of having children on those having children without impoverishing the children... if we had a guaranteed annual income the GAI that? children got could be placed in an account which handled schooling and incidentals, which would put them in the position of enjoying a non-fungible higher standard of living... again, I'm not sure.

: Well, I'm not a ...
By: pyrrho314. on 22 Nov 11, 00:43:21
: Well, I'm not a fan of Plato but that's besides the point. I agree with you, and in this vein I agree with gary that America? should see to it that we have ridiculously good, even over the top good, orphanages to address this sort of problem. and I also would like to say that regulating natalism to some degree is well justified on environmental grounds because these address the cost to OTHERS of procreation. I just reject the "potential cost to children" as universally valid.

If we had a ...
By: valeriereified. on 21 Nov 11, 23:45:49
If we had a sustainable environment to take care of all the HUMANS then yes, I would be less concerned about fertility. If we had a system which didn't punish children for being born to poor parents, I would be less concerned about their birth. I'm not saying: Do this for the environment. I'm saying:? Do this for the SPECIES by not cratering the environment. Let that be your legacy to the human race. Plato didn't have children. You think we're weaker as a species for him writing The Republic?

I don't believe ...
By: valeriereified. on 21 Nov 11, 23:38:33
I don't believe there should be a law restricting someone's personal choice and where on earth did you get that from the video?! I said that in this day? and age having children was a manifestly selfish and personal choice. How is that different from mealy-mouthed Democrats who call every abortion a tragedy, save the fact that I'm clearly not trying to placate a voting bloc when I say: Every child is both a tragedy and a precious and sacred societal obligation.

so you think the ...
By: pyrrho314. on 21 Nov 11, 21:19:24
so you think the ideal cost to the environment for a human is zero? And that's "humanism"? If we had a sustainable system you? wouldn't mind natalism?

well, fact is, you ...
By: pyrrho314. on 21 Nov 11, 21:16:38
well, fact is, you are anti-choice if you think there should be a law to enforce antinatalist ideas... and the pro-lifers are anti-choice, while we are also pro-choice on the semiurge side, that is, the side that is not pro-natalist (another anti-choice position)... we believe it's a personal decisions and there are many reasons not? to have children.

Better then that we ...
By: valeriereified. on 13 Aug 11, 05:36:43
Better then that we let the free market fix it? The bio-fuels tax credit, for one, will get the TDP plant that had been operating in Cambridge at an after-tax cost of $80 a barrel to profitability, so yes, govt's necessary for the turnaround from a fossil fuel economy. As for the etymology? Dunno, but "It has been advanced by figures such as Schopenhauer,? Ehrlich, Heine, Cioran, Mainländer, Larkin, Korda, Benatar, Häyry, Ligotti and Stallman" Get thee to a wikipedia.

ddefinition of ...
By: Riv3rQu33n. on 13 Aug 11, 04:40:50
ddefinition of anti:opposed,against. definition of natal:of or relating to the place or time of ones birth.any questions?the name or" idea" you label? yourself,antinatalist.i think is quite clear.your talking out of your ass lady.

funny.you used" ...
By: Riv3rQu33n. on 13 Aug 11, 04:29:31
funny.you used" government" and "clean energy technology" in the same sentence.whats even funnier,is you believe the government would actually do this.you believe your government gives a shit about you breathing any kind of air at all,much less leaving your carbon behind.are you even aware how ignorant you sound?oh,and,"antinatal" ....really?who came? up with that brilliant word?

So yeah... no ...
By: valeriereified. on 07 Aug 11, 17:29:14
So yeah... no response,? no retraction, no backing it up, and an adhominem argument that the facts don't support... byebye. *waves*

Ooh... sure, let's ...
By: valeriereified. on 06 Aug 11, 22:58:20
Ooh... sure, let's open with adhominem why don't we? But I'll say I don't drive, that I live in a high-rise, and that I, at my most liberal and hedonistic estimates, have a 6 ton carbon footprint; an energy bill less than one-third that of the average Canadian, and 2/3rds the Western average. Our food crisis is not so much a food crisis as an energy crisis. And you have? no idea what I attempt to do. That's like saying an alcoholic looks like they don't attempt not to drink.

The reason humanity ...
By: Meowbay. on 06 Aug 11, 22:12:37
The reason humanity has trouble feeding 6 billion of its specimen is a result of a ridiculous distribution problem, not a shortage of food. Another wrong argument in your view; The creation of a new life causing the misery of other humans is not against what is inherent to life as we know it. Sure, you could attempt to rise above being? like an animal, but you don't really look like someone that attempts to eat according to what is there for her. Kind of hypocritical, isn't it?

''Anti-Natalism can ...
By: DerivedEnergy. on 01 Aug 11, 05:08:26
''Anti-Natalism can work ONLY in EcoFascist and Race Socialist regime...'' Not so. The topic of antinatalism could gain more public awareness so that more people are exposed to the ethical issues that? have been and are being put forward in its defence.

...
By: valeriereified. on 02 Jul 11, 07:58:52
islamineurope.blogspot dot com/2010/08/germany-2nd-generation-immigrants.html 1. As this report states children of immigrants have families matching the national average size. 2. Who on earth is calling for defunding existing children? I'm just? calling for better and mandatory sex education and possibly a pension bonus for those who don't have children to account for the income stability they give up.

Okay, let's imagine ...
By: DanishGreatDane. on 02 Jul 11, 06:25:31
Okay, let's imagine that someday UK will cut the financial support for families with kids. What will happen? Since almost every large family in UK is with Immigrant/Pakistani origin, they most likely will "not take in the? ass". Immigrants will start Riots, Protests and white anti-racists will help their cause. "Anti-Natalism" can't work (in MultiKulti capitalist west) Anti-Natalism can work ONLY in EcoFascist and Race Socialist regime... we don't have such regime :)

Wait, when the fuck ...
By: valeriereified. on 01 Jul 11, 19:13:44
Wait, when the fuck did I become a cultural relativist. I long ago decided human rights trumped by archaic or newly developed predatory practices don't cease to bring my opprobrium? at the border. But, in this struggle, buying them, off as it were, is the best solution to the problems of overpopulation. Surplus incomes and a welfare state mean that parents are no longer in need of old age security from having many children. De-familialize incomes and births decrease.

Understand my ...
By: DanishGreatDane. on 01 Jul 11, 05:10:31
Understand my position, Europe is Under-Populated and this is why our Governments brings immigrants. Capitalism/Consumerism with their constant media brainwashing - turned the men and women into asexual/career obsessed zombies. Most westerners are Consumers and Materialists, this is why they don't breed. Over-population is only problem in the Third-world, and since you are Cultural Relativist,? you never will point the truth. "Anti-Natalism" is product of western boredom

I imagine, given ...
By: valeriereified. on 30 Jun 11, 22:14:00
I imagine, given your regular access to this medium, that your back-to-the-Pleistocene politics might be included in that? As? Gwynne Dyer points out, we have reached a level of population now that requires energy-intensive agricultural practices to feed the planet. So if we try to minimize our footprint, billions will still starve to death. Also there are trans people in Uganda, as well as "PaleoConservatives" there trying to outlaw anyone who is gender or sex variant.

Ask yourself why ...
By: DanishGreatDane. on 30 Jun 11, 05:33:58
Ask yourself why ONLY in west weird ideas exist? Anti-Natalism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Anarcho-Communism, Anarcho-Volunterism, Paleoconservatism, WeirdAssLiberalism etc Weird ideas and retards exist... simply because they have lack of hard life. Moderate and comfort life turn people into greedy pigs, they start to see Problems where they? don't exist. For example Overpopulation... Europe is Under-populated (this is why we bring immigrants), Overpopulation is only in Africa/Asia

Well I? do like ...
By: valeriereified. on 29 Jun 11, 22:39:44
Well I? do like goods and services... and leisure!

An Editorial on the Harper Majority
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 131 seconds

Alternate lyric: Tomorrow we'll bash t******s
Anybody who hasn't seen spitting image, I'm disappointed.

Related: canada, trans rights, parliament

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

$What Rachel Maddow doesn\$

What Rachel Maddow doesn't say about trans issues in America
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 233 seconds

$Dan Choi on Erasure, and a Valerie Re: on Rachel Maddow\$

Dan Choi on Erasure, and a Valerie Re: on Rachel Maddow's Silence on Trans Rights
Posted by: valeriereified

Video duration: 289 seconds

Thrill as I shamelessly steal a goodly bit of Rachel Maddow's format to show how really really bad she is at actually being for equal rights.

Related: maddow, trans erasure, silent homophobia, dan choi

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Electronic Cigarette Videos

Search

Electronic Cigarette Related Videos

Electronic Cigarette Sponsors