Nist video compilations | Electronic Cigarette Videos

======================================
Try Ecigarette For FREE At http://tryecigarette.com
======================================

PFD / NIST Research Burn
Posted by: phxfd

Video duration: 335 seconds
Global video hits: 23439

In the year 2000, the Phoenix Fire Department and the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted live burn tests on four residential structures to determine how long after ignition a structural roof collapse would occur.

Related: collapse, phoenix fire department, nist, roof, burn, test, research, house

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

What is NIST?
Posted by: usnistgov

Video duration: 297 seconds
Global video hits: 16702

For more than a century, the Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology has partnered with industry, academia, and government to build an advanced science and technology infrastructure -- the foundation needed to ensure continuing innovation, industrial competitiveness, and the highest quality of life for all Americans. www.nist.gov

Related: nist, doc, time, innovation, fuel, cell, efficiency, technology, science, standards, industry, computer, nano, research, robots, laboratories, measurement, competitiveness, infrastructure, quality, calibration, atomic, clock, nobel, prize, quantum, buildings, nanotubes, dots

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Full volume and ...
By: jmmiyaki. on 19 Jan 12, 05:20:01
Full volume and couldn't? hear what the speaker or other people were saying. Music effects came in very loudly though.

Nice?
By: porbyza. on 30 Dec 11, 01:29:26
Nice?

poor credibility. ...
By: Paogrin. on 20 Jul 11, 00:27:04
poor credibility. add hydrogen with oxygen to produce energy and water... isnt it supposed to be using water to produce hydrogen and? oxygen that turns into energy? poor credibility indeed.

poor credibility. ...
By: Paogrin. on 20 Jul 11, 00:25:52
poor credibility. add hydrogen with oxygen to produce energy and water... isnt it supposed to be using water to? produce hydrogen and oxygen? poor credibility indeed.

poor credibility?
By: Paogrin. on 20 Jul 11, 00:23:54
poor credibility?

good !?
By: jobrs2010. on 18 Sep 10, 20:33:39
good !?

I agreed.?
By: happyageingHongKong. on 26 May 10, 04:19:26
I agreed.?

what is nist please ...
By: rockyraji. on 21 Apr 10, 12:33:15
what is nist please tell me in general words? ??

from where can i ...
By: rockyraji. on 15 Apr 10, 19:57:44
from where can i get? more info on NIST A GOOD ONE PLZ TELL ME

lol NIST is nearly? ...
By: Sammo2301. on 22 Feb 10, 20:03:16
lol NIST is nearly? as good as my engineering, lol state of the art, haha, I just made my own nanotechnology lab

Can NISTs findings ...
By: kometta4u. on 30 Dec 09, 23:01:14
Can NISTs findings be used in court? As part of the NCST Act, no part of any report resulting from investigations can be admitted as? evidence or used in any suit or action for damages. Additionally, NIST employees are not permitted to serve as expert witnesses.

Yes. Both WWV and ...
By: usnistgov. on 21 Jul 09, 16:48:08
Yes. Both WWV and WWVH will? send QSL cards.

does Nist still ...
By: andybowe. on 21 Jul 09, 00:45:30
does Nist still mail QSL Cards for accurate reception reports of WWV and WWVH on 2.5 5? 10 15 and 20 Mhz?

I love this ...
By: foxxpup. on 23 May 09, 00:47:44
I love this institution!! My favorite service is precision time. I love my atomic watch that is always on the money thanks to? NIST. :-)

great? video!
By: citizentube. on 11 May 09, 15:04:28
great? video!

Yay NIST! Haha, ...
By: shortstuph123. on 13 Feb 09, 08:38:55
Yay NIST! Haha, my? dad was so excited about this channel - he is a low temp physicist at NIST Boulder.

Thanks for checking ...
By: usnistgov. on 29 Jan 09, 02:46:42
Thanks for checking out our videos. Please add your comments and let us know what you think. We will? be reviewing and then posting comments as long as they are on topic, respectful and do not promote specific products or services.”

The NIST WTC 7 Report is False
Posted by: DK1Ryan

Video duration: 676 seconds
Global video hits: 16461

This presentation describes some of the ways in which the 2008 WTC 7 report from the National Institute of Standard and Technology is false an unscientific.

Related: education, authorstream, presentations

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Well said!?
By: justinwdesautels. on 28 May 12, 07:06:01
Well said!?

NIST: and there are ...
By: neo bodhisattva. on 19 May 12, 11:55:17
NIST: and there are nukes in iraq too.. ho ho ho ha ha ha he hu haha.?

ROQUEFORTFILES GET ...
By: inacarjam. on 14 May 12, 10:47:03
ROQUEFORTFILES GET YOU FACTS STRAIGHT & YOU WERE NOT THERE ALL DAY YOU ARE A LIAR..YOU HAVE NO CLUE ON WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT..FOR YOU TO WRITE THEIR FOCUS WAS TO SAVE THE LIVES AT WTC 1&2 PROVES WITHOUT A DOUBT YOU FULL OF SHIT..THE HUGE FIRE THAT WAS INSIDE THAT BUILDING WAS JUST PLAIN WHITEWASH & WE HAVE VIDEOS FROM FOIA THAT SHOW THE EXPLOSIONS GOING OFF..FACT HUGE WHITE FLASHES THAT CAN BE DISPUTED..DON'T YOU LIVE IN CANADA? FACT IS YOU HAVE NO CLUE! WHAT? ABOUT THE BODIES INSIDE THE LOBBY?

It's just funny to ...
By: oi565. on 29 Mar 12, 11:32:44
It's just funny to watch some building demolitions gone? wrong in youtube. WTC towers fell much smoother and on demolitions experts plan carefully where they put the bombs...

9-11 WAS? SO AN ...
By: AngryPotSmoker. on 15 Feb 12, 02:25:15
9-11 WAS? SO AN INSIDE JOB

@CNNFootage67 So ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 19 Jan 12, 06:36:40
@CNNFootage67 So how is it i get a message from CNN and a message from? Wildhawks minutes apart with the exact same topic? and both of those go to the same home page?

@CNNFootage67? ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 19 Jan 12, 06:17:01
@CNNFootage67? Don't be an idiot mr CNN. Mr WILDHAWKS.. probably Mr hotters.. Mr Azar.. Mr Dressup. Playing 5 cards at Bingo tonight?

@CNNFootage67 ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 19 Jan 12, 06:04:21
@CNNFootage67 CNN? WILDHAWKS?? Hmmmm same page? ? Jerking off again tonight?

twisting of the top ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 06:21:41
twisting of the top corner, this doesnt happen in the real footage Really? Would like a link to the video showing it? The top of the? building is collapsing LOoooong before it actually drops. Why is that? Because ALL the internal supports are failing across the structure. There is where your.."Free fall" comes from. YOU FAIL AGAIN You are so mis/uninformed its sad. Back attcha dude!!

take a small amount ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 06:18:07
take a small amount in a firing mechanism and what happens? lol LOL indeed. On a cement floor an acre across? Weighing 650 tonnes? Yeah? don't think so!!

Once again. Have ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 06:16:08
Once again. Have you read the oral histories? (No) Chief Dan Nigro (You don't get much higher) was in charge of 7 all day. His decision to abandon it and let it burn to focus on saving the guys who were in the WTC collapses. (I'll paraphrase it for you) ". Never heard a thing when it collapsed. The conspiracy stories are nonsense, I was at 7 all day" (end) If you guys were REALLY interested in truth you? wouldn't spend your time looking for Conspiracy vids.

you sent me to an ...
By: FjukTheFed. on 10 Jan 12, 06:12:07
you sent me to an establishment propaganda video, in this video Kevin Ryan wasnt allowed to even look at the? data that NIST put into their computer model. So what do they have to hide? A lot, apparently. In a computer model you can put in any information to make it collapse the way you want it to. And actually it doesnt match up at all, the computer model shows a twisting of the top corner, this doesnt happen in the real footage YOU FAIL AGAIN You are so mis/uninformed its sad.

/watch?v= ...
By: FjukTheFed. on 10 Jan 12, 06:04:16
/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw watch the whole thing and instead of listening to what one person said, look at the actual pictures and footage of the building. So all the footage is lying? And i? love your double standard concerning firemen /watch?v=y2A8VMg_B64 /watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o /watch?v=UhGcBxONSvc&feature=related your thermite comment, i could make the same comparison to gun powder, a bucket of gunpowder wont do much but take a small amount in a firing mechanism and what happens? lol

Are you sure you're ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 06:01:20
Are you sure you're done? What do you think is going to happen to a building when all the internal supports collapse? There IS NOTHING supporting it. Once it reaches that point of global failure... ITS GONE!!.? That's not my opinion guys like Shayam Sunder who investigated this says exactly the same thing. There is a video on line of B7 and the NIST simulation running side by side. They line up PERFECTLY. You should check it out!!

And lastly, how is ...
By: FjukTheFed. on 10 Jan 12, 05:49:16
And lastly, how is it that? you are right about everything but NIST had to make multiple corrections to their report on WTC7 and the fact that a high school physics teacher proved free-fall for the first 8 stories which forced NIST to admit it that there was free fall. So what makes you confident you know it all when even NIST doesnt? and, I'm done.

I just find it ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 05:46:10
I just find it really really sad that so many of you guys foam at the mouth about all this stuff on YT. But in reality you are simply ill informed and ill educated about the whole thing. So this guy is lying is he? An? FDNY fireman? There with 7 all day? He was there. You weren't. And you know over this guy? watch?v=kMr3ZSL6l-4 Forward to the 6:55 mark. Listen to Frank Papalia.

"The building is ...
By: FjukTheFed. on 10 Jan 12, 05:42:38
"The building is about 90%? air." you really are in idiot territory...

"Once failure ...
By: FjukTheFed. on 10 Jan 12, 05:41:25
"Once failure happens why is one floor going to have any higher rating than another floor? It isn't. The next floor is? rated to hold 1500 tons as well. But? now it has 15 floors landing on it. Next floor has 16.. Next has 17. Ya falla?" Yea I follow the law of physics that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, you consistently avoid this law and claim that floors will maintain their energy after impacting another object. You fail basic physics

the obvious signs ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 05:19:44
the obvious signs of CD? are the pyroclastic cloud flow and the building dropping straight down. Pyroclastic flow has nothing to do with it. Believe me!! had ANY of these buildings been rigged for a CD. There isn't a soul in lower Manhattan that WOULDN'T know about it. ? I have been there and i know what one of these is like. This is a VERY silly topic. Its really too bad. Ignorance and stupidity won't get you too far. Have fun in the "TM".

If you? know ...
By: FjukTheFed. on 10 Jan 12, 05:15:43
If you? know anything about CD like you claim, the obvious signs of CD are the pyroclastic cloud flow and the building dropping straight down. Have you even seen the building 7 collapse video? even the related videos on the side shows no fires on wtc7. You are a shill and I hope the victims haunt your dreams. The first people to question the official conspiracy theory from the govt. were the victims families, I'm on their side, whose side are you on?

AHAHAHAHAH o man "a ...
By: FjukTheFed. on 10 Jan 12, 05:04:25
AHAHAHAHAH o man "a couple of charges? of thermite" so those concrete slabs just turned to dust in mid air? "When the building came down? it was completely involved in fire, all forty-seven stories. --FDNY Assistant Chief Harry Myers" AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHH Show me the pictures!!!!!!!!!!!! The video of WTC7 imploding has ABSOLUTELY NO VISIBLE FIRES. and NIST already admitted that the supposed damage from wtc 1 was a non-factor. You are a blatantly denying reality

I'm on the side of ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 04:55:24
I'm on the side of truth, you're on the side of making excuses. You're an innocence theorist. What excuses have i made? Everything i have told you is factually correct. I know what is involved to CD a building. I have some experience in this area. And i know enough to know that a slab of concrete (an acre across!!) is not turned to powder by? a couple of charges of thermite. Explosives don't do this either!! When i hear stuff like this? I am in idiot territory!!

So explain wtc7 ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 04:45:50
So explain wtc7 which was not hit by a plane and had small isolated fires When the building came? down it was completely involved in fire, all forty-seven stories. --FDNY Assistant Chief Harry Myers (What part of " a few isolated fires" does all 47 stories cover?) number Seven, which had taken a big hit from the north tower. When it fell, it ripped steel out from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey Street. --FDNY Chief Frank Fellini

thats what a ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 04:26:56
thats what a natural? collapse looks like from a fire MUCH GREATER than the small wtc fires, AND the steel structure remained intact! That's because that building has a cement internal core!!!. Have you bothered reading the firemen oral histories? You should. B7 was? no mystery to anyone dealing with it. They were fully aware it was going to come down. And nobody heard anything when it fell. I have experience with a CD. Let me tell you.. people would know!!

ahahha yea one ...
By: roquefortfiles. on 10 Jan 12, 04:19:23
ahahha yea one floor wont hold the weight of 14 or more floors, but 88? can hold 12. Doesn't work like that!! Once failure happens why is one floor going to have any higher rating than another floor? It isn't. The next floor is rated to hold 1500 tons as well. But now it has 15 floors landing on it. Next floor has 16.. Next has 17. Ya falla?

NIST Explosions
Posted by: pjczz

Video duration: 124 seconds
Global video hits: 65053

Hi, Looking through the newly released batch of videos from NIST and I found some interesting stuff in the folder "Richard Peskin." I have a edited together bits from four of the clips in that folder where you can hear what sound like explosions (after both towers have fallen), and the...

Related: 911, truth, nist, explosions, wtc

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

After David ...
By: Skeptic121. on 20 Oct 10, 14:54:32
After David Chandler raised the issue,? Sunder admitted free fall (without the adverb "nearly") for 2.25 seconds, which equals 25 meters. You are right; the inside of the building was not visible through the north and west facades. Your side makes some assumptions about the interior as well!

"Dr. Sunder at NIST ...
By: PapaOystein. on 20 Oct 10, 12:47:30
"Dr. Sunder at NIST admitted WTC7 dropped at free fall for 25 meters." Not sure if Sunder worded anything sloppily, but the NIST repoorts and presentations prove you WRONG; It wasn't the *building* that dropped *at* free fall, it was only a part of the "north face" that dropped *near* free fall. The distinctions are important, It is highly telling that truthers, to make their (false)? claims, consistently MISrepresent what NIST stated. I have yet to meet one who said it right.

@ pjczz: "They seem ...
By: PapaOystein. on 20 Oct 10, 12:34:01
@ pjczz: "They seem to be located around (wait for it)... Building 7" - how can you tell? You are making that up, right? Wishful thinking? "They seem to be located around the WTC complex" would be the most you can say - and even that? not strictly from the video sound track. Some could, for all you know, be cars crashing as they flee the onrush of dust.

Because those files ...
By: TheAudie08. on 19 Oct 10, 21:08:17
Because those files were evidence of the Enron scandal and other investigations into criminal activities...but its pointless arguing with ppl because your going to have your opinion and I'm going to have mine...I just want a new investigation into 9/11..more money was spent on? Clintons affair scandal then an investigation of 9/11.

Dr. Sunder at NIST ...
By: Skeptic121. on 19 Oct 10, 17:43:48
Dr. Sunder at NIST admitted WTC7 dropped at free fall for 25 meters. NIST also reported that the upper east and west corners of the north facade dropped within a half second of each other. For a 100 meter wide facade, that meets my definition of "evenly". Dr. Sunder is a Brahmin, a member of the priestly and intellectual caste? of India. Therefore he won't lie, but he can't follow the facts to their conclusion. The COLLAPSE of WTC7 is not the anomaly; the MANNER of the collapse is.

I didn't say diesel ...
By: wollclark. on 19 Oct 10, 17:28:04
I didn't say diesel and car explosions alone took down the building, there was also that pesky 25% of a corner taken out of the base of the building and the fire. Speaking? of which, it didn't fall evenly, or in free fall. Are you also willing to believe Chief Daniel Nigro had a "senior moment" as well? /watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k /watch?v=_kSq663m0G8 /watch?v=43F54hR0NW8 /watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk

Also, why would you ...
By: wollclark. on 19 Oct 10, 17:20:34
Also, why would you destroy the building just to get? rid of some files and to stop purposes of some offices? Doesn't that seem a bit excessive and stupid?

No, I took ...
By: wheelst. on 19 Oct 10, 17:14:05
No, I took chemistry in college, my? degree is in computer science, so I am not a chemist or engineer. However I can read well enough to understand the report. If you are having problems interpreting parts of the report I can point you to in- depth annalists of it.

So FEMA, and the ...
By: wheelst. on 19 Oct 10, 17:04:03
So FEMA, and the people who cleaned up the site were not Americans? You are forgetting that there were people looking at that building prior to it coming down. City engineers, fire investigators and civil engineers. What they saw as consistent with what NIST concluded. There was and is no creditable evidence of explosives so why look for? them? If you are truly interested, look at all the evidence, not just what fits your theory.

Those three ...
By: wollclark. on 19 Oct 10, 16:59:45
Those three buildings had a lot of "first times" for a lot of? things. /watch?v=_MRSr1MnFuk

Did you take ...
By: Skeptic121. on 19 Oct 10, 16:58:28
Did you take chemistry in high school? I'm not trying to be unpleasant but I need to? know where to start! Thanks!

Again, this is as ...
By: wheelst. on 19 Oct 10, 16:49:11
Again, this is as consistent with debris falling on them as it is anything else. Why if they were so close to cutter charges going off why did they? show no signs of it? At the very least I would expect them have partial hearing loss, most likely complete for days after. I have read App. C and it talks about material that has not been exposed to temperature above 1000c and shows signs of environmental wear. What is your point?

I'm willing to ...
By: Skeptic121. on 19 Oct 10, 14:31:35
I'm willing to believe Lucky Larry was having a senior moment.? I am not willing to believe diesel exploded and brought down WTC7 evenly at free fall for 25 meters.

Have you listened ...
By: Skeptic121. on 19 Oct 10, 14:25:08
Have you listened to Jennings' and Hess's words? They said the stairs under them were blown out. I would love to look for evidence of explosives in WTC7, unfortunately only a few pieces of debris survive. The rest was recycled in Asia. National security apparently required that Americans NOT see the debris...but Asians OK. Prof. Jonathan Barnett examined one piece of debris from? WTC7 and found remarkable effects of VERY hot sulfur. NOT sulfate, as in drywall. See FEMA Appendix C

RIGHT...You ask why ...
By: TheAudie08. on 19 Oct 10, 12:43:48
RIGHT...You ask why they took down building 7 because it had the Enron files, it had offices for the Secret Service and CIA...."pull it" is a term used in demolition..it means "pull down the building" ...Obviously its not suspicious enough? because most Americans still don't even know that a third building collapsed on 9/11. First time three steel building collapsed due to fire.

needed*?
By: wollclark. on 19 Oct 10, 03:17:56
needed*?

debunking911? com
By: wollclark. on 19 Oct 10, 03:16:26
debunking911? com

"science isnt need" ...
By: wollclark. on 19 Oct 10, 03:14:50
"science isnt need" That's all I need to read to? know you're a moron.

"Pull it" is not a ...
By: wollclark. on 19 Oct 10, 03:12:48
"Pull it" is not a demolition term, he was referring to pulling out the firefighters because they knew from the damage the building was going to come down. There are videos of firefighters talking about the damage. There were diesel fuel tanks in the building, which are most likely the cause? of the explosions heard, besides the damaged cars at the base of the building. Why would conspirators take down building 7 if it wasn't hit by a plane? Wouldn't that be a bit suspicious?

You have to be a ...
By: wollclark. on 19 Oct 10, 03:04:00
You have to be a damn fool to think audio of explosions six hours before a buildings collapse is evidence of an incredibly slow demolition? job.

And you do not ...
By: wheelst. on 18 Oct 10, 22:06:37
And you do not think that they could have been mistaken? Are they demolition experts? Do they have expertise in what if feels and sounds like to have the building they are in pelted with debris from a 110 story building? As there is nothing else that back up their story, and no evidence that explosives were actually used in the building, I? would need much more than their statements.

Jennings and Hess ...
By: Skeptic121. on 18 Oct 10, 21:59:24
Jennings and Hess said very clearly that they heard and felt explosions in WTC7 that were NOT just debris falling on them. ?

Jennings and Hess ...
By: wheelst. on 18 Oct 10, 16:35:33
Jennings and Hess heard explosions as building one was falling on top of them,? so it is more likely that what they heard was the sounds from that event. Other that that there were other people who examined the building both before and after the collapse who did not see evidence of damage consistent with explosives. Bomb sniffing dogs, and trained investigators were on site, but two people who heard loud noises as 110 story building fell on them are evidence of what?

Nice, no answer for ...
By: wheelst. on 18 Oct 10, 16:27:49
Nice, no answer for my comment so you resort to ad hominem.? Brilliant!

Nothing left? Are ...
By: wheelst. on 18 Oct 10, 16:24:00
Nothing left? Are you kidding me? Before you make another comment like this one, do some actual independent reading about the cleanup operation, then get back to me. ? So far all you have shown is you do not know what happened.

WTC 7 NIST Model vs. Reality
Posted by: NanoThermite911

Video duration: 129 seconds
Global video hits: 30630

Special Thanks to: www.YouTube.com femr2.ucoz.com This video shows that the NIST Report on WTC 7 is not representative of reality and cannot possibly explain the phenomenon which took place on 9 en.wikipedia.org/wik i/Hermeneutics en.wikipedia.org/wik i/Facticity

Related: 911, world, trade, center, building, seven, wtc7, nist

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Their new videos ...
By: zenoist2. on 21 May 12, 15:54:44
Their new videos still have the whole building deforming and bending if you look at the official NIST site. Try as they might they cannot get it to fall perfectly symmetrically no matter how they load the figures The only thing theyve proven is that the rubble and fire damage theory doesnt fit known facts? and is impossible.

Being there, taping ...
By: TuesdayMorningInSept. on 05 May 12, 01:47:46
Being there, taping all but the first strike..? the perspective is quite different. Not the sensational news media broadcasts.. "I? watched the attack, and kept watching, Making comments from my heart, my mind, and intuition, without the influence of what some.. news agency was feeding? me." 'Tuesday Morning in? September' Preview; listen to the over two hour continuous running wtc attack chronicle on my channel.. in its entirety. Something new from that day; released a decade later

YOU? WANT TO SUCK ...
By: PostToastie. on 13 Apr 12, 21:42:52
YOU? WANT TO SUCK OUR WHAT?

?9/11 WAS? ...
By: PostToastie. on 13 Apr 12, 21:41:07
?9/11 WAS? OBVIOUSLY A FALSE FLAG EVENT PERPETRATED TO CREATE PERPETUAL WAR AGAINST AN INVISIBLE ENEMY CALLED "TERRORISM". A 'WAR ON TERROR'? THAT WILL NEVER END UNTIL YOU DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. ?YOU RESERVE THE RIGHT TO BE LABELED A TERRORIST AND KILLED? BY YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT. ?BARRY JENNINGS SAYS: "REMEMBER BUILDING SEVEN!" ?REINSTATE THE CONSTITUTION! ?END THE IMPERIALISM! ?INFOWARS? DOT COM ?AE911TRUTH DOTORG? ?FIREFIGHTERSFOR911TRUTH DOTORG ?THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE! ?WAR IS BAD?

It's? obvious to ...
By: NowKillYourself. on 13 Apr 12, 19:21:33
It's? obvious to anyone with a brain. Maybe someday you'll figure it out. Is your caps lock stuck on or something? Fucking moron.

Truther cocks.?
By: MrYib. on 06 Apr 12, 11:17:08
Truther cocks.?

Trt?
By: MrYib. on 06 Apr 12, 11:16:59
Trt?

So it took you a ...
By: GnosticNinja. on 25 Mar 12, 22:04:26
So it took you a year to tell me you finally read the 'report'. Ttripe wasn't it. Anything else to add? Why not explain how common it is that buildings do this and why structural engineers are so fucking stupid they have yet to design a stable structure. While you're at it try and convince a "twoofer" using physics why if it was gutted so much, as OFT faithers condend, did it not collapse to the side where there was missing jenga blocks. How does kerosene? cause instant global joint collapse?

Nice assumption? ...
By: zerton. on 25 Mar 12, 18:28:00
Nice assumption? That is stated in the NIST report. Fucking idiot. If you're going to criticize people for not reading the report, at least? read it.

Are you an engineer ...
By: zerton. on 25 Mar 12, 18:27:04
Are you an engineer? Move out of your parents house and go? get a real job.

HOW? DO YOU FIGURE?
By: PostToastie. on 24 Mar 12, 17:19:57
HOW? DO YOU FIGURE?

You? are a kook.
By: NowKillYourself. on 24 Mar 12, 16:02:57
You? are a kook.

9/11 WAS? OBVIOUSLY ...
By: PostToastie. on 18 Mar 12, 14:47:10
9/11 WAS? OBVIOUSLY A FALSE FLAG EVENT PERPETRATED TO CREATE PERPETUAL WAR AGAINST AN INVISIBLE ENEMY CALLED "TERRORISM".-- -----A WAR ON 'TERROR' THAT WILL NEVER END UNTIL YOU DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. YOU RESERVE THE RIGHT TO BE LABELED A TERRORIST AND KILLED BY YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT. -- BARRY JENNINGS SAYS: "REMEMBER BUILDING SEVEN!" REINSTATE THE CONSTITUTION! END THE IMPERIALISM! INFOWARS? DOT? COM, AE911TRUTH DOTORG, FIREFIGHTERSFOR911TRUTH DOTORG, THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE! WAR IS BAD

GO DRINK? SOME MORE ...
By: PostToastie. on 18 Mar 12, 14:46:51
GO DRINK? SOME MORE FLUORIDE.

wow the 15 year? ...
By: koertje. on 15 Feb 12, 19:42:12
wow the 15 year? old boy was there and you werent there to rape him? Is 15 too old for you?

*Thermate?
By: username7046. on 16 Jan 12, 21:18:51
*Thermate?

why don't you show ...
By: meandemeanor. on 13 Jan 12, 07:11:53
why don't you show the penthouse structure in the real footage? Oh wait, I already know the? answer.

ok, if they had ...
By: mjwible27. on 03 Dec 11, 01:43:41
ok, if they had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks that bin laden wanted to carry out and they offered to turn him over??? Think dude. Yes, most of the evidence? was destroyed and shipped away, which the law was broken by doing so, research that too. Dust clouds all the evidence you need is in there, which was tested and came back thermite was in them. Look it up, look up everything I said, all facts.

The US didn't want ...
By: NowKillYourself. on 02 Dec 11, 18:35:26
The US didn't want to compromise with the Taliban to get Bin Laden, do? you blame them? The Taliban are a brutal regime that mutilate women and kill innocent people simpy over their beliefs. No way was the United States going to drop sanctions on the Taliban government. They knew they would get Bin Laden eventually and guess what, THEY DID! Anyway, when are you going to stop the heresay circumstantial bullshit and give me some hard evidence? Not a single stick of material evidence yet.

up the Phoenix memo ...
By: mjwible27. on 30 Nov 11, 13:52:22
up the Phoenix memo, the knew about it, then why lie and cover it up?? 4th, The Taliban offered to turn Bin Laden over in February 2001 if the US dropped sanctions on their country. 5th, myself being prior military, any threat whether big or small, the US Armed forces would have been put on the highest alert( Phoenix memo) Now, do your research and do it hard before you insult people. I go by facts and not? what the media force feeds me, unlike the dweebunker nation

ok pal, let me feed ...
By: mjwible27. on 30 Nov 11, 13:48:42
ok pal, let me feed you some facts. Do you know that 1993 WTC bombing was set up, funded and allowed by our own FBI? Yet, not a? single agent was brought to trial, look it up, there's also audio recordings on youtube as well. 2nd, the planes used that day exceeded there max operating speeds at sea level ranging 80 to 120 knots over, which is IMPOSSIBLE. 3rd, Bush and Rice both lied and said they had NO prior knowledge of Bin Laden wanting to strike in the US using planes, look

In a court of law ...
By: mjwible27. on 29 Nov 11, 22:52:15
In a court of law if you had 20 jurors and 3 of them said the person was not guilty, then what is that called? Silly Dweebunkers and your fantasy world you live in. Facts are facts, give me your best shot so I can shut you down with hard facts, not made up RKOwens videos. 10 years later and it's now over 40% of Americans believe the government had or allowed 9/11 to proceed, silly ass sheep. ?

So to sum up on the ...
By: wellifthemediasaysit. on 29 Nov 11, 22:08:12
So to sum up on the truthers vs shills debate, one side now has 1000s of architects, engineers, actors, sportsmen, politicians, and millions of citizens, as well as the laws of physics, common sense, and what their eyes and ears tell them....the other side is a few abusive people who exist only on? the internet, with several usernames, whose only answers to normal questions about 9/11 are filled with 'twooftard, asstard, lol, lmfao, twoofie' etc etc, geeeee i wonder which side is most believable?

You're a clown. I'm ...
By: NowKillYourself. on 29 Nov 11, 16:36:21
You're a clown. I'm still waiting for these "Facts". Ten years and not a single whistle blower. Hmmm, I wonder why? You idiots say the Bush Administration was so incompetent, yet you're saying they managed to pull of? the biggest conspiracy in the history of mankind? Or at least the United States. Get the fuck outta here. Again, provide evidence of this "inside job" or stop wasting my time.

There are over ...
By: NowKillYourself. on 29 Nov 11, 16:33:58
There are over 750,000 architects and engineers in the United States and you could only get 1,500 of them onboard with your fantasy bullshit? LOL, that says a lot about you twoofers. Face it moron, you were suckered into the Truth movement. You want to be one of the few people who KNOW THE? TRUTH, therefore you have some inside information that the majority of America doesn't have. You're so intelligent. Ten years now and not a single paper published by the Truther movement. FAIL.

Tangled Webs - NIST and WTC7
Posted by: 71gerry

Video duration: 317 seconds
Global video hits: 8145

Latest comments made on this video:

Fabulous! An ...
By: JP lanck. on 29 May 12, 14:29:11
Fabulous! An ignorant fool invoking terms used in formal rhetoric. You know as much about logic as you know about engineering: NOTHING! None of my assumptions are wrong, as you know, because they are supported by real evidence. What real? evidence do you have for your idiotic fantasies? Still? nothing?

Well thats ...
By: Gunt78. on 29 May 12, 09:24:05
Well thats obviously the area to be debated. We all know that this is a divisive subject amongst experts. I'm? no demolitions expert, are you? Did your response really require you to hurl insults? All it does is reinforce the negative stereotype of "shrill, aggressive irrational, paranoid twoofer"! Thats not the way to win hearts and minds.

the? collapse is ...
By: JP lanck. on 29 May 12, 03:40:11
the? collapse is measured from the roof line, you chattering howler monkey. Do you realize you have the IQ of a salad bar?

Hi Ruth, Reading ...
By: Sandberg1972. on 20 Apr 12, 07:55:30
Hi Ruth, Reading your response I'm pretty sure u were unable to comprehend the contend of this video. But maybe you can prove me wrong by reacting with a solid thoroughly thought through response. Think you can do that? Look, you've written 3 sentences, all 3 of them are very vague & non specific. You could have a go at improving them so that they make more sense. I'm? not a fan of Conspiracy Nuts as well, just like you. I don't like mindless videos as well, just like you. Be more specific.

The most ...
By: Funkadelic2. on 16 Apr 12, 21:16:29
The most interesting thing is not the collapse time, but the acceleration of the roof line. Doesn't matter whether the penthouse collapsed seconds or hours before the perimeter structure. The observed part of? the structure accelerated at the rate of gravity over eight stories.

I am an Architect ...
By: Mi37591. on 04 Apr 12, 23:25:57
I am an Architect with a Masters Degree from U of M, Ann Arbor, MI. The? WTC7 was blown up.

yeah thermal? ...
By: tinfoilhatter. on 28 Mar 12, 05:26:01
yeah thermal? expansion my ass

Are they trying to ...
By: WELLGURU. on 27 Mar 12, 18:28:32
Are they trying to say that at 9 am trade centers hit by jets ok they fell not much to say but at 5 pm the bld 7 2 blocks away never hit by anything a 47 steel bld. just falls down at free fall speed because a beam slipped off ? BS ! inspectors look at all beams and ? they would fail the livin shit out of your work and RED tag it ! you could not take it down in 5 hrs with a wrecking ball come on people you been hood winked

Unfortunately ...
By: ChezKiva. on 26 Mar 12, 23:25:06
Unfortunately people? are easily conned.

On the day it was ...
By: ChezKiva. on 26 Mar 12, 23:23:54
On the day it was crowned to have been 'topped-out,' the project architect on #7 said to me: "Good ole #7, the building that never should have been built!" Historically, this is an? unprescedented event on the face of it, which it suggested to me that 'the fix was in,' by 1989, NOT later...

You Conspiracy Nuts ...
By: RuthWBarnes. on 26 Mar 12, 15:34:23
You Conspiracy Nuts are sad and sickening..... NO matter? what evidence and facts, you believe you alone are privy to the truth.... Another mindless video..

ha? ha :-)
By: keiththegreatest. on 22 Mar 12, 08:04:07
ha? ha :-)

That's ...
By: dynoplasm. on 22 Mar 12, 03:20:39
That's accomplished? a rich diet. :-)

If you're ...
By: SexyMelon. on 19 Mar 12, 12:02:09
If you're interested, I don't think AE have ever conceded that point considering they were the ones who claimed it to be deceptive in the first place. /watch?v=xl4jbNA5Nlo Namely, the way NIST timed collapse of the penthouse in addition to descend of the main frame (which is what's typically called the "collapse") only supports their theory on the? basis of circular logic, i.e. "You can see X indicated by this penthouse collapse. Why? Because this penthouse collapse indicates X."

You're? right? ...
By: BloodTar. on 16 Mar 12, 22:18:39
You're? right? Hell, we're saving money for 'em already.

This didn't even ...
By: 71gerry. on 16 Mar 12, 19:03:41
This didn't even have jet fuel. Just office fires. That? saves 10 gallons

I know the point ...
By: 71gerry. on 16 Mar 12, 16:52:54
I know the point you are making well, and I could happily debate anyone on it.The NE corner takes around 6.6s to go? from rest to the ground,the 12-15s thing is frankly just BS.The penthouse collapse 8s or so before this is an internal failure,but the roofline has not moved at that point.If i ask you did the building collapse symmetrically would you agree?I'm guessing that you would.It follows then that the roofline movement is the place to start your watch,and not the penthouse collapse.

William "Willy" ...
By: trex9008. on 16 Mar 12, 15:01:51
William "Willy" Rodriguez, The Last Man Out, was a custodian in WTC and was accommodated (W) for his actions that saved lives, including physically challenged person, AND helped firemen on that fateful day (Sept. 11, '01). Shouldn't his testimony have NIST analyzing dust for EXPLOSIVES instead of saying we didn't look because there is NONE? What did he say to 911 Com., it wasNEVEReven mentioned in their report? Why is there NO investigation?? Because it is a coverup forMICCheers?

William "Willy" ...
By: trex9008. on 16 Mar 12, 15:00:01
William "Willy" Rodriguez, The Last Man Out, was? a custodian in WTC and was accommodated (W) for his actions that saved lives, including physically challenged person, AND helped firemen on that fateful day (Sept. 11, '01). Shouldn't his testimony have NIST analyzing dust for EXPLOSIVES instead of saying we didn't look because there is NONE? What did he say to 911Com., it was NEVER even mentioned in their report? Why is there NO investigation? Because it is a coverup forMICCheers?

TWoT(TheWaronTer.," ...
By: trex9008. on 16 Mar 12, 14:37:34
TWoT(TheWaronTer.,"Raygun") is a business on the American? model(create your market), any evil(alcohol, tobacco, firearms,etc.) for society has NO bearing, only profit. Those in charge(Cheney/Bush, "Rummy," NORAD)of MICC (Mil.Ind.CongressionalComplex,"Ike") executed 9/11(NewPearlHarbor,PNAC'99) to get U.S. all on board NeoconCrazyTrain. Afganny&IraqWar threat are "fake" except to those fighting. OCT(Of.Con.Theory,Prof.D.RayGriffin) is used for FraudWar, Prof. A. Hall($tax)forOIL, fallslike7WTC:(

provide? the ' ...
By: Gunt78. on 16 Mar 12, 14:22:43
provide? the 'skeptics' and debunkers with a very effective weapon to repeatedly beat us with.

I believe 911 was ...
By: Gunt78. on 16 Mar 12, 14:21:02
I believe 911 was an inside job of some sort. However, you undermine your position by ignoring the fact that before the building collapsed the penthouse collapsed in on the buidling taking the total collapse period to about 12 - 15 seconds (I can't? remember the specific time). This was finally admitted by A&E for 911 and there reasoning for ignoring was that they didn't want to let down all the people who had invested in the truth movement. This is hugely problematic and does nothing but

Okay, so the next ...
By: BloodTar. on 15 Mar 12, 23:26:13
Okay, so the next time one of these skyscrapers needs to be demolished into its own footprint, then the city should just hire a couple of homeless guys to go into the building with a few 5 gallon cans of jet fuel, set a floor or two on fire and be done with it. No need to hire out anymore demolitions? to those expensive demolition companies, just pay the homeless guys off with a few packs of cigarettes, a few meals and $100 each.

Thanks Chas! The ...
By: 71gerry. on 15 Mar 12, 17:42:12
Thanks Chas! The guys? who research this with me are pretty good at what they do. The way it looks so far, we could end up on part 357 eventually if we try to cover every 'mistake' that NIST make. Its great to see so many people viewing these and hopefully getting some new info from them. Thanks brother.

Good Job Brother. I ...
By: 324Chas. on 15 Mar 12, 17:30:54
Good Job Brother. I say brother because I don't know Scottish expression for dude. Is it mate? Or is that just for England and Australia? I don't get out? much. Really enjoyed the ease at which you could explain it.

9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST
Posted by: physicsandreason

Video duration: 594 seconds
Global video hits: 18177

Does NIST think Newton's laws are only suggestions?

Related: 911, experiments, newton, acceleration, velocity, chandler, science, physics, debunk, weight, nist

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Completely FALSE, ...
By: cheerdiver. on 24 Apr 12, 15:27:35
Completely FALSE, collapse was initiated from below the core columns by P-238, NOT U-235. The exterior columns carried about 40% of the structures weight. Once the core was undermined, the exterior failed at it weakest point the FAKE holes created for the airliner illusion. Dimitri Khalezov published this info, then? MSM began to promote the "themite theory". Granite contains Al2O3 and FeO2 the comp of thermite. The dust was primarally Alumino silicate(reaction of Silicon and aluminum O2 granite)

The collapse ...
By: igykalen. on 21 Apr 12, 06:44:15
The collapse started at the point? of impact. Did you forget that?

Per Port Authority ...
By: JJTheJunkMan1. on 19 Apr 12, 06:34:45
Per Port Authority records; every steel member in WTC were rated a safety factor of 3. meaning they were able to support 3x more than they actually were in addition to supporting the weight above them. as the collapse occurs, massive amounts of material are ejected in all directions. know what that means ? It means a loss of? mass as well as a loss of stress and load. the collapse was top-down, or did you forget that ?

The beams that had ...
By: igykalen. on 05 Apr 12, 23:58:49
The beams that had gave way and were no longer supporting the higher floors were? now forcing the lower floor beams to support more load than they were designed for. If every floor could hold all of the floor above them with any structural defects, then why bother having any beams past the first floor? Even in a demolition this is how a building is brought down. One way or the other, that is the only way the building could have collapsed. Consult a structural engineer is you cannot follow this

if a floor weighs? ...
By: JJTheJunkMan1. on 05 Apr 12, 06:30:39
if a floor weighs? 10 tons, it STILL weighs 10 tons regardless of its condition; hence 10 floors would still weigh 100 tons. and a floor supporting that 100 tons would still only be supporting that 100 tons collapsed or not. your HS science teacher either failed miserably or is so completely ashamed right now. Now if you want to get into acceleration, then you cross over into the absolute fact that resistance ( support ) HAD to be removed before collapse as the collapse didnt create NEW mass

the mass increased ...
By: JJTheJunkMan1. on 05 Apr 12, 04:53:00
the mass increased ? really ? hmmmm, it seems to me that the mass remained exactly the same. if a floor is built to withstand the mass of ten floors above it, the ten floors above it? don't magically gain mass because they were destroyed. with the outward ejection of much of the material, the exact opposite can be argued actually. if, say, the fifth floor is engineered to support 95 floors above it then the weight of those floors is STILL the weight of those floors regardless

Why they didn't ...
By: igykalen. on 30 Mar 12, 09:53:33
Why they didn't check? It was one of? their first theories they were able to rule out. Explosives that make noise would have been loud enough to hear. The thermite/thermate would have been indistinguishable from what would have been in the concrete rubble.

Contrary to what ...
By: igykalen. on 30 Mar 12, 09:48:15
Contrary to what you may have been led to believe, architects that build sky scrappers understand why it came down and NIST isn't the sole source of smart people in the world. They've already release recommendations for how buildings should be built. They don't need to hand out an analysis to the general public that could be used to bring? down current buildings with similar designs.

U wrote this ...
By: VD420herpes. on 29 Mar 12, 00:42:30
U wrote this 2months ago but it's top comment... speaking about comuter simulations lol - NIST's computer simulation of building 7: Their input data has been requested? via a FOIA request and was denied, for reasons that it would be dangerous to people. We still build skyscrapers lol. If that bldg really did collapes the way it said it did, I'd feel safer with the architects knowing that information, wouldn't you? lmao. Nist didn't even CHECK for explosives fyi,& only examined 20% of the steel.

NATIONAL SECURITY ...
By: Sockpuppet2012. on 25 Jan 12, 02:49:51
NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT -? 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK /watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak? Out,? Full-length, Pre-Release-v1.3; Low-Res. /watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ 9/11? - Missing Links ( full movie ) /watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4 Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11 /watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg

Erm.... is this ...
By: ThePeage. on 22 Jan 12, 09:54:01
Erm.... is this comment really for me? If you are saying that? the official story is impossible, then we agree.

It would appear ...
By: ThePeage. on 22 Jan 12, 09:49:30
It would appear that you have not understood NIST's claims regarding the collapse of WTC7. If you understood the claims, you may not support them. The claim is that thermal expansion (not "loss of strength") pushed column 79 off its seat by moving it 5.5 inches. Do you see the problem with this? In addition, NIST claims that the failure of 79 "in any circumstance" would have caused? the building to collapse (see my channel comments for more on this).

You haven't read my ...
By: ThePeage. on 22 Jan 12, 09:43:26
You haven't read my reply. I ask the question to find out if denial makes further exchange a waste of time - nothing more. If you had claimed, as some have, that it looks NOTHING LIKE a CD, then I would have ended our exchange. Re? your "experiment", if that is true and I have "taken it out of context", then why did you post it here? To claim that it was in any way relevant to the collapse of the TT seems to be either an attempt to mislead or ignorance.

: How many ...
By: BadBoriBoy. on 22 Jan 12, 00:27:51
: How many different types of electronics are there?!?! All CD means is that something is being destroyed in a? controlled fashion. Even if you bulldozed the damn thing it would still be considered a "CD". I swear people overuse words without knowing it's true meaning. Prime example : Conspiracy is an act involving more than 1 person with an intent to deceive. So when people say there is no 9/11 conspiracy it makes me laugh b/c you treat it like religion. Official story is IMPOSSIBLE!!!

My experiment was ...
By: igykalen. on 21 Jan 12, 15:44:36
My experiment was in reference to the physics mentioned in a video I watched 2 months ago. You're linking it to something entirely different. In any event if all you have is that if it looks like a CD, then it must be one, then yes, you are? wasting your time. Is the loss of strength from thermal expansion effects of the fire impossible? What computer models and simulations have been done by anyone to show this? It "looks" like a CD. That's your analysis of this?

I ask that question ...
By: ThePeage. on 21 Jan 12, 09:04:40
I ask that question because I have had debunkers tell me that it looks nothing like a CD, even that it looks EXACTLY like a collapse? due to fire. That level of denial makes further exchanges a waste of time. Yes you are trying to move the goalposts. I asked you if you are still claiming that your baseball/glass "experiment" is analogous to the top 15 floors falling onto the bottom 80 or so? Yes or no?

Mass x Velocity = ...
By: igykalen. on 21 Jan 12, 01:48:41
Mass x Velocity = increased force. Not moving any goal posts. You last question has so many double negatives in it, I'm not sure you even know what you're trying to ask. I am not... does not... was? not. I'm not a politician. Speak clear. If all you're trying to say is: does it look like a CD, then I say to that, who cares what it "looks like." The moon landing "looks like" it was faked to some people. Who cares what it looks like. Back it up with something then.

Please don't move ...
By: ThePeage. on 12 Jan 12, 15:53:34
Please don't move the goalposts - I asked if you had realise the flaw in your baseball/glass "experiment". Are you still going to claim that this is analogous to the top 15 floors falling onto the bottom 80 or so? Btw, I don't claim any of the towers fell at FF in their entirely. Known CD's don't fall at FF either. You aren't suggesting that WTC7 doesn't? look like a CD (even if it wasn't) are you?

You do know that as ...
By: igykalen. on 12 Jan 12, 14:22:19
You do know that as the building came down the mass increased as well. The additional mass came from the building under it that was? getting destroyed. Gravity didn't stop pulling and the mass was increasing. How would it have slowed down it a completely stop? Also, it only appears that it fell at free fall speed,

(2) rather than ...
By: ThePeage. on 11 Jan 12, 13:13:24
(2) rather than continuing through the sheet? of glass. Did it? Of course, if you are seriously suggesting that your baseball would be travelling at "terminal velocity" you might as well use a bullet and claim that is analogous to the top of the building falling a few floors. It isn't. That you don't understand that is a problem. A bullet (or baseball) travelling through a pane of glass may not appear to slow down, but it does slow down - you do understand that, don't you?

No. It wasn't the ...
By: ThePeage. on 11 Jan 12, 13:07:16
No. It wasn't the spelling of "weight". You didn't seem to understand that it is the deceleration that is? important, not the velocity during the fall. The whole point about the TT is that the smaller "block" falling onto the larger "block" didn't slow down as it descended. Not only was your baseball made of entirely different materials with different properties to your glass, but I will GUARANTEE that it slowed when it broke the glass - I expect it bounced off (2)

Have you managed to ...
By: igykalen. on 11 Jan 12, 11:44:50
Have you managed to figure out what's wrong with the logic of that sentence yet? If not, why not? Was it? the spelling of 'weight'? The whole i before e thing really throws me off.

Have you worked out ...
By: ThePeage. on 10 Jan 12, 14:32:39
Have you worked out what you? did wrong yet with your baseball/glass "experiment"? If not, why not?

NATIONAL SECURITY ...
By: Sockpuppet2012. on 04 Jan 12, 00:53:59
NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT -? 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK /watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o 9/11: Explosive Evidence? - Experts Speak? Out, Full-length, Pre-Release-v1.3; Low-Res. /watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ 9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie ) /watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4 Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11 /watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg

Israel did 911 ...
By: Sockpuppet2012. on 15 Dec 11, 15:47:35
Israel did 911 TakeOurWorldBack? (dot) com YouTube? video: 911 Missing Links

NIST Colloquium Series: The Measure of All Things
Posted by: usnistgov

Video duration: 4434 seconds
Global video hits: 7866

In this session from the NIST Colloquium Series, Ken Adler, author of "The Measure of All Things: The Seven Year Odyssey and Hidden Error that Transformed the World", tells the story of the seven-year, trouble-filled 18th century expedition that established the distance for the meter ... and about the secret "error" held from the public about this famous measurement.

Related: nist colloquium series, the measure of all things, ken adler, odyssey, secret, measurement, government, meter, france, history, longitude, latitude

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

NIST Puts Smart Phone Translation Technology to the Test
Posted by: usnistgov

Video duration: 200 seconds
Global video hits: 40533

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is helping the Defense Department evaluate the in-the-field performance of two-way, real-time voice translation systems for use in Afghanistan.

Related: nist, darpa, defense department, translator, translation device, voice translation system, pashto, smart phone, afghanistan, star trek, universal translator, evaluation, performance testing, cell, phone, innovation

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

This technology is ...
By: Tim11472. on 24 Mar 12, 13:38:18
This technology is absolutely amazing. I? am the owner of a 24 / 7 call center in Illinois & we offer claim services to insurance & fleet leasing companies. Our phone system is pretty sophisticated, but one of our largest challenges is the many languages we encounter. Is your product available to translate Spanish to English full circle? Also do you have a product that can be installed into a call center atmosphere?

wow Great.I lOVE ...
By: powerpashtoons. on 02 Dec 10, 12:32:21
wow Great.I lOVE Pashto.It is Great language.In Pashto say:Ta Sanga Ye ?it means how are you? Za? Kha Yam Its means I am Fine :):):

That is? really ...
By: samh09. on 07 Oct 10, 05:16:48
That is? really cool.

I want a klingon ...
By: applekidtw. on 08 Sep 10, 08:17:39
I want a klingon version...?

I heard that? ...
By: kalucardable. on 02 Sep 10, 15:10:45
I heard that? Talibans put a higher price on capturing interpretors than US soldiers. Are you training for this dialect?

curiously enough ...
By: captainFLUORESCENT. on 02 Aug 10, 14:07:52
curiously enough that StarTrek translator device seems more like? StarWars lightsaber(TM)...

From Craig ...
By: usnistgov. on 27 Jul 10, 18:50:00
From Craig Schlenoff, Project Leader, NIST TRANSTAC Evaluation Team The time the systems takes to translate? a sentence does vary with the length of the sentence. A few words sentence may only take a second or two while a longer sentences (10 words) may take 4-5 seconds.

From Craig? ...
By: usnistgov. on 27 Jul 10, 12:36:07
From Craig? Schlenoff, Project Leader, NIST TRANSTAC Evaluation Team The systems tend to work better on shorter, simpler sentences, but can still be used for more complex sentences. From initial analysis, utterances that are less than 15 words seem to work best with roughly linear degradation after that as a function of the number of words.

From Craig ...
By: usnistgov. on 27 Jul 10, 12:35:29
From Craig Schlenoff, Project Leader, NIST TRANSTAC Evaluation Team For this? effort, we have focused on one dialect of Pashto, namely Kandahari. However, when the same systems were put in front of people who speak other dialects, they still worked, though not as well. The systems are only as good as what they are trained on ... if you train them on other dialects, they should work equally well on them.

Hitch-Hiker's Guide ...
By: balboarock. on 25 Jul 10, 09:24:43
Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy predicted this with the Babel-Fish! It's fascinating to see this technology being put to good use; this is an absolute necessity for the protection of the troops and civilians alike. I? wonder: is this technology capable of interpreting variations in local dialects and offering 'sets' of possible interpretations to either/both end-users in situations where a translation is ambiguous, thereby replicating the more precise skills one would expect from a human?

That was the? nexus ...
By: conorsmurf. on 24 Jul 10, 17:50:01
That was the? nexus one... anyway..

Thanks for checking ...
By: usnistgov. on 19 Jul 10, 20:22:56
Thanks for checking out our videos. Please add your? comments and let us know? what? you? think. We will be? reviewing and then? posting comments as long as they? are? on? topic,? respectful and do not promote specific products??? or services?.

NIST Colloquium Series: Baked Alaska: Changing Climate - Changing Landscapes
Posted by: usnistgov

Video duration: 5258 seconds
Global video hits: 19151

Alaska's landscapes?ever changing in response to active physical processes? are very sensitive indicators of climate change. In this presentation, geologist Bruce Molnia describes the post-Little Ice Age behavior of Alaskan glaciers, focusing on the continuing changes occurring within Glacier Bay National Park.

Related: nist, bruce molnia, geologist, us geological survey, climate change, global warming, glaciers, ice age, alaska, glacier bay national park, glaciation, tectonics, seismicity, sedimentation, isostatic rebound, and sea level change.

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

current CO2 levels ...
By: vengencefrom1979. on 06 Sep 11, 23:33:57
current CO2 levels are at 392 ppm, within 3 years they will hit 400 ppm, a level not seen for millions of years. global warming has the potential to defrost antarctica not in centuries or even decades but years. antarctica is connected to every tectonic plate around the world. when trillons of tons of ice are removed it will rise out of the ocean by as? much as five miles and crack the earths crust. this is not a doom and gloom prophesy, this is science. we are going to need a lot ot trees.

Ross Ice Shelf ...
By: kiwikimmyd. on 28 Feb 11, 03:56:43
Ross Ice Shelf breaking off Ross Island happening this week. Started last? Tuesday, around the same time as the Chch earthquake. They're evacuating personnel off Ross Island before the winter, before the runways for the Globemasters are gone. They can see the sea through the cracks now. There was some talk about it on Radio NZ, but not being reported elsewhere. So this was interesting...to hear about the rate of velocity behind these glaciers increasing as the ice shelf goes.

Cold is good for ...
By: Constantia1000. on 10 Dec 10, 01:19:25
Cold is good for California sometimes things need to purify about the soil anyway. When the earths populations plunder the Earth continually it creates a negative vacuum if I could describe it like? that 'Hippie style'. Californians tend to be rather natural Naturalists whom are sensitive.

Glaciers recede and ...
By: gunthaarz. on 13 Oct 10, 15:29:57
Glaciers recede and increase in size mainly because of increase in or declines in precipitation, not because of melting as far as knowledge I've been able to gather... if more of the precipitation falls as rain in spring summer autumn, than as snow,? this might tell us something about long term cycles in weather patterns much more than anything substantial about the temperature.

Thanks for checking ...
By: usnistgov. on 03 Sep 10, 13:25:24
Thanks for checking out our videos. Please add your? comments and let us know what you? think. We will be?? reviewing and then? posting comments as long as they? are? on topic,? respectful and do not promote specific products??? or?? services

NIST Flashover.mpg
Posted by: AKFireTraining

Video duration: 250 seconds
Global video hits: 9019

This video demonstrates flashovers in three situations: Dry Scotch Pine Christmas Tree Living Room with Sofa Office Cubicle Thank you to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for producing this video.

Related: fire, flashover, tree, office

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

St Baldricks @ NIST
Posted by: dropsofchances

Video duration: 274 seconds
Global video hits: 52

Also includes footage from St Baldricks at Hong Kong International School - 20

Related: st, baldricks, movie

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

Electronic Cigarette Videos

Search

Electronic Cigarette Related Videos

Electronic Cigarette Sponsors